IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1012448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SEMbap: Bow-free covariance search and data de-correlation

Author

Listed:
  • Mario Grassi
  • Barbara Tarantino

Abstract

Large-scale studies of gene expression are commonly influenced by biological and technical sources of expression variation, including batch effects, sample characteristics, and environmental impacts. Learning the causal relationships between observable variables may be challenging in the presence of unobserved confounders. Furthermore, many high-dimensional regression techniques may perform worse. In fact, controlling for unobserved confounding variables is essential, and many deconfounding methods have been suggested for application in a variety of situations. The main contribution of this article is the development of a two-stage deconfounding procedure based on Bow-free Acyclic Paths (BAP) search developed into the framework of Structural Equation Models (SEM), called SEMbap(). In the first stage, an exhaustive search of missing edges with significant covariance is performed via Shipley d-separation tests; then, in the second stage, a Constrained Gaussian Graphical Model (CGGM) is fitted or a low dimensional representation of bow-free edges structure is obtained via Graph Laplacian Principal Component Analysis (gLPCA). We compare four popular deconfounding methods to BAP search approach with applications on simulated and observed expression data. In the former, different structures of the hidden covariance matrix have been replicated. Compared to existing methods, BAP search algorithm is able to correctly identify hidden confounding whilst controlling false positive rate and achieving good fitting and perturbation metrics.Author summary: Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) directed graph, with variables at the vertices and direct causal connections at the edges, can be used to illustrate the causal structure of the SEM, but this does not always mean that all significant factors are considered. We examine a class of models that may include some hidden variables. Specifically, we consider that the graph represents a bow-free acyclic path diagram (BAP), where the directed edges signify direct causal effects, while the bidirected edges suggest hidden confounders. In this paper, we provide a two-step deconfounding technique based on BAP search, which is included into the SEM framework via the SEMbap() function implemented in the R package SEMgraph. Secondly, we want to offer a significant evaluation of the most advanced deconfounding techniques using both synthetic and real data, as well as knowledge of a biological signaling pathway encoded in a DAG, in terms of (i) SEM fitting, (ii) system perturbation, and (iii) recovery performance metrics. The BAP search algorithm outperforms current techniques in accurately detecting hidden confounding, regulating false positive rate, and producing well-fitting and perturbation metrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario Grassi & Barbara Tarantino, 2024. "SEMbap: Bow-free covariance search and data de-correlation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012448
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012448
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012448&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey T Leek & John D Storey, 2007. "Capturing Heterogeneity in Gene Expression Studies by Surrogate Variable Analysis," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(9), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:jss:jstsof:40:i14 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:plo:pgen00:1002078 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Emanuele Aliverti & Kristian Lum & James E. Johndrow & David B. Dunson, 2021. "Removing the influence of group variables in high‐dimensional predictive modelling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(3), pages 791-811, July.
    4. Seungchul Baek & Yen‐Yi Ho & Yanyuan Ma, 2020. "Using sufficient direction factor model to analyze latent activities associated with breast cancer survival," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1340-1350, December.
    5. Griffin, Maryclare & Hoff, Peter D., 2019. "Lasso ANOVA decompositions for matrix and tensor data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 181-194.
    6. Delaram Pouyabahar & Tallulah Andrews & Gary D. Bader, 2025. "Interpretable single-cell factor decomposition using sciRED," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Chee Ho H’ng & Shanika L. Amarasinghe & Boya Zhang & Hojin Chang & Xinli Qu & David R. Powell & Alberto Rosello-Diez, 2024. "Compensatory growth and recovery of cartilage cytoarchitecture after transient cell death in fetal mouse limbs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Mark Reimers, 2010. "Making Informed Choices about Microarray Data Analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-7, May.
    9. Leek Jeffrey T & Storey John D., 2011. "The Joint Null Criterion for Multiple Hypothesis Tests," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Nicoló Fusi & Oliver Stegle & Neil D Lawrence, 2012. "Joint Modelling of Confounding Factors and Prominent Genetic Regulators Provides Increased Accuracy in Genetical Genomics Studies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, January.
    11. Yuto Hasegawa & Juhyun Kim & Gianluca Ursini & Yan Jouroukhin & Xiaolei Zhu & Yu Miyahara & Feiyi Xiong & Samskruthi Madireddy & Mizuho Obayashi & Beat Lutz & Akira Sawa & Solange P. Brown & Mikhail V, 2023. "Microglial cannabinoid receptor type 1 mediates social memory deficits in mice produced by adolescent THC exposure and 16p11.2 duplication," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Sudhir Varma, 2020. "Blind estimation and correction of microarray batch effect," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Friguet, Chloé & Causeur, David, 2011. "Estimation of the proportion of true null hypotheses in high-dimensional data under dependence," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(9), pages 2665-2676, September.
    14. Xuemeng Zhou & Tsz Wing Sam & Ah Young Lee & Danny Leung, 2021. "Mouse strain-specific polymorphic provirus functions as cis-regulatory element leading to epigenomic and transcriptomic variations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Michael W Nagle & Jeanne C Latourelle & Adam Labadorf & Alexandra Dumitriu & Tiffany C Hadzi & Thomas G Beach & Richard H Myers, 2016. "The 4p16.3 Parkinson Disease Risk Locus Is Associated with GAK Expression and Genes Involved with the Synaptic Vesicle Membrane," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Oliver Stegle & Leopold Parts & Richard Durbin & John Winn, 2010. "A Bayesian Framework to Account for Complex Non-Genetic Factors in Gene Expression Levels Greatly Increases Power in eQTL Studies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-11, May.
    17. Gao Wang & Abhishek Sarkar & Peter Carbonetto & Matthew Stephens, 2020. "A simple new approach to variable selection in regression, with application to genetic fine mapping," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(5), pages 1273-1300, December.
    18. Kaido Lepik & Tarmo Annilo & Viktorija Kukuškina & eQTLGen Consortium & Kai Kisand & Zoltán Kutalik & Pärt Peterson & Hedi Peterson, 2017. "C-reactive protein upregulates the whole blood expression of CD59 - an integrative analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Zhang, Lyuou & Zhou, Wen & Wang, Haonan, 2021. "A semiparametric latent factor model for large scale temporal data with heteroscedasticity," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    20. Stephen Salerno Jr. & Mahya Mehrmohamadi & Maria V Liberti & Muting Wan & Martin T Wells & James G Booth & Jason W Locasale, 2017. "RRmix: A method for simultaneous batch effect correction and analysis of metabolomics data in the absence of internal standards," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, June.
    21. Chuan Gao & Ian C McDowell & Shiwen Zhao & Christopher D Brown & Barbara E Engelhardt, 2016. "Context Specific and Differential Gene Co-expression Networks via Bayesian Biclustering," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-39, July.
    22. Leah Briscoe & Brunilda Balliu & Sriram Sankararaman & Eran Halperin & Nandita R Garud, 2022. "Evaluating supervised and unsupervised background noise correction in human gut microbiome data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-25, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.