IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1011004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model certainty in cellular network-driven processes with missing data

Author

Listed:
  • Michael W Irvin
  • Arvind Ramanathan
  • Carlos F Lopez

Abstract

Mathematical models are often used to explore network-driven cellular processes from a systems perspective. However, a dearth of quantitative data suitable for model calibration leads to models with parameter unidentifiability and questionable predictive power. Here we introduce a combined Bayesian and Machine Learning Measurement Model approach to explore how quantitative and non-quantitative data constrain models of apoptosis execution within a missing data context. We find model prediction accuracy and certainty strongly depend on rigorous data-driven formulations of the measurement, and the size and make-up of the datasets. For instance, two orders of magnitude more ordinal (e.g., immunoblot) data are necessary to achieve accuracy comparable to quantitative (e.g., fluorescence) data for calibration of an apoptosis execution model. Notably, ordinal and nominal (e.g., cell fate observations) non-quantitative data synergize to reduce model uncertainty and improve accuracy. Finally, we demonstrate the potential of a data-driven Measurement Model approach to identify model features that could lead to informative experimental measurements and improve model predictive power.Author summary: Mathematical models used to explore network-driven cellular processes from a systems perspective face a challenge in the dearth of quantitative data required for model calibration. We address this challenge with a combined Bayesian and Machine Learning measurement model approach to explore how quantitative and many non-quantitative data constrain models of apoptosis execution. We find model prediction accuracy and certainty depend on rigorous data-driven formulations of the measurement, and the size and make-up of the datasets. We also find different non-quantitative dataset can be combined to synergistically better support model calibration. Finally, we demonstrate the use of a data-driven Measurement Model approach to identify model features that could lead to informative experimental measurements and improve model predictive power.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael W Irvin & Arvind Ramanathan & Carlos F Lopez, 2023. "Model certainty in cellular network-driven processes with missing data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-31, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011004
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011004&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eshan D. Mitra & Raquel Dias & Richard G. Posner & William S. Hlavacek, 2018. "Using both qualitative and quantitative data in parameter identification for systems biology models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Michael Pargett & Ann E Rundell & Gregery T Buzzard & David M Umulis, 2014. "Model-Based Analysis for Qualitative Data: An Application in Drosophila Germline Stem Cell Regulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Alejandro F. Villaverde, 2019. "Observability and Structural Identifiability of Nonlinear Biological Systems," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-12, January.
    4. Sajtos, Laszlo & Magyar, Bertalan, 2016. "Auxiliary theories as translation mechanisms for measurement model specification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3186-3191.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Inmaculada López & Zoltán Varga & Manuel Gámez & József Garay, 2022. "Monitoring in a Discrete-Time Nonlinear Age-Structured Population Model with Changing Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Martina Prugger & Lukas Einkemmer & Samantha P Beik & Perry T Wasdin & Leonard A Harris & Carlos F Lopez, 2021. "Unsupervised logic-based mechanism inference for network-driven biological processes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-30, June.
    3. Nerea Martínez & Alejandro F. Villaverde, 2020. "Nonlinear Observability Algorithms with Known and Unknown Inputs: Analysis and Implementation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Wolfgang Ulaga & Michael Kleinaltenkamp & Vishal Kashyap & Andreas Eggert, 2021. "Advancing marketing theory and practice: guidelines for crafting research propositions," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 395-406, December.
    5. Liu, Jie & Boutat, Driss & Liu, Da-Yan & Zhang, Xue-Feng, 2025. "Nonlinear MIMO observable normal forms with output injection and output diffeomorphism," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 489(C).
    6. Henseler, Jörg & Schuberth, Florian, 2020. "Using confirmatory composite analysis to assess emergent variables in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 147-156.
    7. Nathaniel J Linden & Boris Kramer & Padmini Rangamani, 2022. "Bayesian parameter estimation for dynamical models in systems biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-48, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.