IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1010484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structured random receptive fields enable informative sensory encodings

Author

Listed:
  • Biraj Pandey
  • Marius Pachitariu
  • Bingni W Brunton
  • Kameron Decker Harris

Abstract

Brains must represent the outside world so that animals survive and thrive. In early sensory systems, neural populations have diverse receptive fields structured to detect important features in inputs, yet significant variability has been ignored in classical models of sensory neurons. We model neuronal receptive fields as random, variable samples from parameterized distributions and demonstrate this model in two sensory modalities using data from insect mechanosensors and mammalian primary visual cortex. Our approach leads to a significant theoretical connection between the foundational concepts of receptive fields and random features, a leading theory for understanding artificial neural networks. The modeled neurons perform a randomized wavelet transform on inputs, which removes high frequency noise and boosts the signal. Further, these random feature neurons enable learning from fewer training samples and with smaller networks in artificial tasks. This structured random model of receptive fields provides a unifying, mathematically tractable framework to understand sensory encodings across both spatial and temporal domains.Author summary: Evolution has ensured that animal brains are dedicated to extracting useful information from raw sensory stimuli while discarding everything else. Models of sensory neurons are a key part of our theories of how the brain represents the world. In this work, we model the tuning properties of sensory neurons in a way that incorporates randomness and builds a bridge to a leading mathematical theory for understanding how artificial neural networks learn. Our models capture important properties of large populations of real neurons presented with varying stimuli. Moreover, we give a precise mathematical formula for how sensory neurons in two distinct areas, one involving a gyroscopic organ in insects and the other visual processing center in mammals, transform their inputs. We also find that artificial models imbued with properties from real neurons learn more efficiently, with shorter training time and fewer examples, and our mathematical theory explains some of these findings. This work expands our understanding of sensory representation in large networks with benefits for both the neuroscience and machine learning communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Biraj Pandey & Marius Pachitariu & Bingni W Brunton & Kameron Decker Harris, 2022. "Structured random receptive fields enable informative sensory encodings," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-28, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010484
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010484
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010484&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010484?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carsen Stringer & Marius Pachitariu & Nicholas Steinmetz & Matteo Carandini & Kenneth D. Harris, 2019. "High-dimensional geometry of population responses in visual cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 571(7765), pages 361-365, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thanh-an Pham & Aleix Boquet-Pujadas & Sandip Mondal & Michael Unser & George Barbastathis, 2024. "Deep-prior ODEs augment fluorescence imaging with chemical sensors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Yuke Yan & James M. Goodman & Dalton D. Moore & Sara A. Solla & Sliman J. Bensmaia, 2020. "Unexpected complexity of everyday manual behaviors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Kenneth W. Latimer & David J. Freedman, 2023. "Low-dimensional encoding of decisions in parietal cortex reflects long-term training history," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Leonhard Waschke & Fabian Kamp & Evi Elzen & Suresh Krishna & Ulman Lindenberger & Ueli Rutishauser & Douglas D. Garrett, 2025. "Single-neuron spiking variability in hippocampus dynamically tracks sensory content during memory formation in humans," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Edward A. B. Horrocks & Fabio R. Rodrigues & Aman B. Saleem, 2024. "Flexible neural population dynamics govern the speed and stability of sensory encoding in mouse visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Jean-Paul Noel & Edoardo Balzani & Cristina Savin & Dora E. Angelaki, 2024. "Context-invariant beliefs are supported by dynamic reconfiguration of single unit functional connectivity in prefrontal cortex of male macaques," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Jérémie Sibille & Carolin Gehr & Jonathan I. Benichov & Hymavathy Balasubramanian & Kai Lun Teh & Tatiana Lupashina & Daniela Vallentin & Jens Kremkow, 2022. "High-density electrode recordings reveal strong and specific connections between retinal ganglion cells and midbrain neurons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Ghislain St-Yves & Emily J. Allen & Yihan Wu & Kendrick Kay & Thomas Naselaris, 2023. "Brain-optimized deep neural network models of human visual areas learn non-hierarchical representations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Patrice Abry & B. Cooper Boniece & Gustavo Didier & Herwig Wendt, 2023. "Wavelet eigenvalue regression in high dimensions," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-32, April.
    10. Rong J. B. Zhu & Xue-Xin Wei, 2023. "Unsupervised approach to decomposing neural tuning variability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. W. Jeffrey Johnston & Stefano Fusi, 2023. "Abstract representations emerge naturally in neural networks trained to perform multiple tasks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Ege Altan & Sara A Solla & Lee E Miller & Eric J Perreault, 2021. "Estimating the dimensionality of the manifold underlying multi-electrode neural recordings," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, November.
    13. Mehrabbeik, Mahtab & Shams-Ahmar, Mohammad & Levine, Alexandra T. & Jafari, Sajad & Merrikhi, Yaser, 2022. "Distinctive nonlinear dimensionality of neural spiking activity in extrastriate cortex during spatial working memory; a Higuchi fractal analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Elisabeta Balla & Gerion Nabbefeld & Christopher Wiesbrock & Jenice Linde & Severin Graff & Simon Musall & Björn M. Kampa, 2025. "Broadband visual stimuli improve neuronal representation and sensory perception," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    15. repec:plo:pcbi00:1008128 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Camden J. MacDowell & Alexandra Libby & Caroline I. Jahn & Sina Tafazoli & Adel Ardalan & Timothy J. Buschman, 2025. "Multiplexed subspaces route neural activity across brain-wide networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, December.
    17. Maximilian Hoffmann & Jörg Henninger & Johannes Veith & Lars Richter & Benjamin Judkewitz, 2023. "Blazed oblique plane microscopy reveals scale-invariant inference of brain-wide population activity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Disheng Tang & Joel Zylberberg & Xiaoxuan Jia & Hannah Choi, 2024. "Stimulus type shapes the topology of cellular functional networks in mouse visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Kristjan Kalm & Dennis Norris, 2021. "Sequence learning recodes cortical representations instead of strengthening initial ones," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-34, May.
    20. Hammad F. Khan & Sayan Dutta & Alicia N. Scott & Shulan Xiao & Saumitra Yadav & Xiaoling Chen & Uma K. Aryal & Tamara L. Kinzer-Ursem & Jean-Christophe Rochet & Krishna Jayant, 2024. "Site-specific seeding of Lewy pathology induces distinct pre-motor cellular and dendritic vulnerabilities in the cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.