IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1010415.html

A hierarchical process model links behavioral aging and lifespan in C. elegans

Author

Listed:
  • Natasha Oswal
  • Olivier M F Martin
  • Sofia Stroustrup
  • Monika Anna Matusiak Bruckner
  • Nicholas Stroustrup

Abstract

Aging involves a transition from youthful vigor to geriatric infirmity and death. Individuals who remain vigorous longer tend to live longer, and within isogenic populations of C. elegans the timing of age-associated vigorous movement cessation (VMC) is highly correlated with lifespan. Yet, many mutations and interventions in aging alter the proportion of lifespan spent moving vigorously, appearing to “uncouple” youthful vigor from lifespan. To clarify the relationship between vigorous movement cessation, death, and the physical declines that determine their timing, we developed a new version of the imaging platform called “The Lifespan Machine”. This technology allows us to compare behavioral aging and lifespan at an unprecedented scale. We find that behavioral aging involves a time-dependent increase in the risk of VMC, reminiscent of the risk of death. Furthermore, we find that VMC times are inversely correlated with remaining lifespan across a wide range of genotypes and environmental conditions. Measuring and modelling a variety of lifespan-altering interventions including a new RNA-polymerase II auxin-inducible degron system, we find that vigorous movement and lifespan are best described as emerging from the interplay between at least two distinct physical declines whose rates co-vary between individuals. In this way, we highlight a crucial limitation of predictors of lifespan like VMC—in organisms experiencing multiple, distinct, age-associated physical declines, correlations between mid-life biomarkers and late-life outcomes can arise from the contextual influence of confounding factors rather than a reporting by the biomarker of a robustly predictive biological age.Author summary: Aging produces a variety of outcomes—declines in various measures of health and eventually death. By studying the relationship between two outcomes of aging in the same individual, we can learn about the underlying aging processes that cause them. Here, we consider the relationship between death and an outcome often used to quantify health in C. elegans—vigorous movement cessation which describes the age-associated loss of an individuals’ ability to move long distances. We develop an automated imaging platform that allows us to precisely compare this pair of outcomes in each individual across large populations. We find that individuals who remain vigorous longer subsequently have a shorter remaining lifespan—a pattern that holds even after vigorous movement and lifespan timing are both altered by several different mutations and interventions in aging. Modelling our data using a combination of simulation and analytic studies, we demonstrate how the relative timing of vigorous movement cessation and death suggest that these two outcomes are driven by distinct aging processes. Our data and analyses demonstrate how two outcomes of aging can be correlated across individuals with the timing of one predicting the timing of the other, but nevertheless be driven by mostly distinct underlying physical declines.

Suggested Citation

  • Natasha Oswal & Olivier M F Martin & Sofia Stroustrup & Monika Anna Matusiak Bruckner & Nicholas Stroustrup, 2022. "A hierarchical process model links behavioral aging and lifespan in C. elegans," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010415
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010415
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010415&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010415?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Omer Karin & Amit Agrawal & Ziv Porat & Valery Krizhanovsky & Uri Alon, 2019. "Senescent cell turnover slows with age providing an explanation for the Gompertz law," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Laura A. Herndon & Peter J. Schmeissner & Justyna M. Dudaronek & Paula A. Brown & Kristin M. Listner & Yuko Sakano & Marie C. Paupard & David H. Hall & Monica Driscoll, 2002. "Stochastic and genetic factors influence tissue-specific decline in ageing C. elegans," Nature, Nature, vol. 419(6909), pages 808-814, October.
    3. James Vaupel & Kenneth Manton & Eric Stallard, 1979. "The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 16(3), pages 439-454, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jeremy Vicencio & Daisuke Chihara & Matthias Eder & Lucia Sedlackova & Julie Ahringer & Nicholas Stroustrup, 2025. "Engineering the auxin-inducible degron system for tunable in vivo control of organismal physiology," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wolfgang Drobetz & Lars Hornuf & Paul P. Momtaz & Niclas Schermann, 2025. "Token-Based Crowdfunding: Investor Choice and the Optimal Timing of Initial Coin Offerings," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 49(1), pages 232-282, January.
    2. Bagdonavicius, Vilijandas & Nikulin, Mikhail, 2000. "On goodness-of-fit for the linear transformation and frailty models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 177-188, April.
    3. Yahia Salhi & Pierre-Emmanuel Thérond, 2016. "Age-Specific Adjustment of Graduated Mortality," Working Papers hal-01391285, HAL.
    4. Michael Murphy, 2010. "Reexamining the Dominance of Birth Cohort Effects on Mortality," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 36(2), pages 365-390, June.
    5. Feehan, Dennis & Wrigley-Field, Elizabeth, 2020. "How do populations aggregate?," SocArXiv 2fkw3, Center for Open Science.
    6. M. K. Lintu & Asha Kamath, 2022. "Performance of recurrent event models on defect proneness data," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 2209-2218, August.
    7. Il Do Ha & Maengseok Noh & Youngjo Lee, 2010. "Bias Reduction of Likelihood Estimators in Semiparametric Frailty Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(2), pages 307-320, June.
    8. Yashin, Anatoli I. & Arbeev, Konstantin G. & Akushevich, Igor & Kulminski, Alexander & Akushevich, Lucy & Ukraintseva, Svetlana V., 2008. "Model of hidden heterogeneity in longitudinal data," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 1-10.
    9. Andreas Wienke & Anne M. Herskind & Kaare Christensen & Axel Skytthe & Anatoli I. Yashin, 2002. "The influence of smoking and BMI on heritability in susceptibility to coronary heart disease," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2002-003, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    10. Stephen Gyimah & Alex Ezeh & J. Fotso, 2012. "Frailty models with applications to the study of infant deaths on birth timing in Ghana and Kenya," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1505-1521, August.
    11. Rasmus Hoffmann, 2005. "Does the socioeconomic mortality gradient interact with age? Evidence from US survey data and Danish register data," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2005-020, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    12. Filipe Costa Souza & Wilton Bernardino & Silvio C. Patricio, 2024. "How life-table right-censoring affected the Brazilian social security factor: an application of the gamma-Gompertz-Makeham model," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1-38, September.
    13. Maxim S. Finkelstein & Veronica Esaulova, 2005. "On mixture failure rate ordering," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2005-019, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    14. Svetlana V. Ukraintseva & Anatoli I. Yashin, 2005. "Economic progress as cancer risk factor. I: Puzzling facts of cancer epidemiology," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2005-021, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    15. Castellares, Fredy & Patrício, Silvio C. & Lemonte, Artur J., 2020. "On gamma-Gompertz life expectancy," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    16. Silke van Daalen & Hal Caswell, 2015. "Lifetime reproduction and the second demographic transition: Stochasticity and individual variation," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(20), pages 561-588.
    17. Shikhar Tyagi & Arvind Pandey & Christophe Chesneau, 2022. "Weighted Lindley Shared Regression Model for Bivariate Left Censored Data," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(2), pages 655-682, November.
    18. Bessonova, Evguenia, 2023. "Firms’ efficiency, exits and government procurement contracts," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    19. David McCarthy, 2021. "80 will be the new 70: Old‐age mortality postponement in the United States and its likely effect on the finances of the OASI program," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(2), pages 381-412, June.
    20. Hess , Wolfgang & Schwarzkopf , Larissa & Hunger , Matthias & Holle , Rolf, 2013. "Competing-Risks Duration Models with Correlated Random Effects: An Application to Dementia Patients’ Transition Histories," Working Papers 2013:28, Lund University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.