IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1010210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of emergent patterns in crossing flows of pedestrians reveals an invariant of ‘stripe’ formation in human data

Author

Listed:
  • Pratik Mullick
  • Sylvain Fontaine
  • Cécile Appert-Rolland
  • Anne-Hélène Olivier
  • William H Warren
  • Julien Pettré

Abstract

When two streams of pedestrians cross at an angle, striped patterns spontaneously emerge as a result of local pedestrian interactions. This clear case of self-organized pattern formation remains to be elucidated. In counterflows, with a crossing angle of 180°, alternating lanes of traffic are commonly observed moving in opposite directions, whereas in crossing flows at an angle of 90°, diagonal stripes have been reported. Naka (1977) hypothesized that stripe orientation is perpendicular to the bisector of the crossing angle. However, studies of crossing flows at acute and obtuse angles remain underdeveloped. We tested the bisector hypothesis in experiments on small groups (18-19 participants each) crossing at seven angles (30° intervals), and analyzed the geometric properties of stripes. We present two novel computational methods for analyzing striped patterns in pedestrian data: (i) an edge-cutting algorithm, which detects the dynamic formation of stripes and allows us to measure local properties of individual stripes; and (ii) a pattern-matching technique, based on the Gabor function, which allows us to estimate global properties (orientation and wavelength) of the striped pattern at a time T. We find an invariant property: stripes in the two groups are parallel and perpendicular to the bisector at all crossing angles. In contrast, other properties depend on the crossing angle: stripe spacing (wavelength), stripe size (number of pedestrians per stripe), and crossing time all decrease as the crossing angle increases from 30° to 180°, whereas the number of stripes increases with crossing angle. We also observe that the width of individual stripes is dynamically squeezed as the two groups cross each other. The findings thus support the bisector hypothesis at a wide range of crossing angles, although the theoretical reasons for this invariant remain unclear. The present results provide empirical constraints on theoretical studies and computational models of crossing flows.Author summary: You may have noticed that pedestrians in a crosswalk often form multiple lanes of traffic, moving in opposite directions (180°). Such spontaneous pattern formation is an example of self-organized collective behavior, a topic of intense interdisciplinary interest. When two groups of pedestrians cross at an intersection (90°), similar diagonal stripes appear. Naka (1977) conjectured that the stripes are perpendicular to the mean walking direction of the two groups. This facilitates the forward motion of each group and reduces collisions. We present the first empirical test of the hypothesis by studying two groups of participants crossing at seven different angles (30° intervals). To analyze the striped patterns, we introduce two computational methods, a local Edge-cutting algorithm and a global Pattern-matching technique. We find that stripes are indeed perpendicular to the mean walking direction at all crossing angles, consistent with the hypothesis. But other properties depend on the crossing angle: the number of stripes increases with crossing angle, whereas the spacing of stripes, the number of pedestrians per stripe, and the crossing time all decrease. Moreover, the width of individual stripes is “squeezed” in the middle of the crossing. Future models of crowd dynamics will need to capture these properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Pratik Mullick & Sylvain Fontaine & Cécile Appert-Rolland & Anne-Hélène Olivier & William H Warren & Julien Pettré, 2022. "Analysis of emergent patterns in crossing flows of pedestrians reveals an invariant of ‘stripe’ formation in human data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-33, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010210
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010210
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010210&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mehdi Moussaïd & Elsa G Guillot & Mathieu Moreau & Jérôme Fehrenbach & Olivier Chabiron & Samuel Lemercier & Julien Pettré & Cécile Appert-Rolland & Pierre Degond & Guy Theraulaz, 2012. "Traffic Instabilities in Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowds," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-10, March.
    2. repec:plo:pcbi00:1002592 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Dirk Helbing & Illés Farkas & Tamás Vicsek, 2000. "Simulating dynamical features of escape panic," Nature, Nature, vol. 407(6803), pages 487-490, September.
    4. Keisuke Fujii & Takeshi Kawasaki & Yuki Inaba & Yoshinobu Kawahara, 2018. "Prediction and classification in equation-free collective motion dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, November.
    5. repec:plo:pcbi00:1006523 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mullick, Pratik & Appert-Rolland, Cécile & Warren, William H. & Pettré, Julien, 2025. "Eliminating bias in pedestrian density estimation: A Voronoi cell perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 657(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lian, Liping & Song, Weiguo & Yuen, Kwok Kit Richard & Telesca, Luciano, 2018. "Investigating the time evolution of some parameters describing inflow processes of pedestrians in a room," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 507(C), pages 77-88.
    2. Guo, Ning & Jiang, Rui & Wong, S.C. & Hao, Qing-Yi & Xue, Shu-Qi & Xiao, Yao & Wu, Chao-Yun, 2020. "Modeling the interactions of pedestrians and cyclists in mixed flow conditions in uni- and bidirectional flows on a shared pedestrian-cycle road," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 259-284.
    3. Zeng, Tian & Wei, Yidong & Hu, Zuoan & Ma, Yi, 2023. "Comparison study in single-file pedestrian flow dynamics: Foot motion perspective versus head motion perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 629(C).
    4. Zhang, Dawei & Zhu, Haitao & Hostikka, Simo & Qiu, Shi, 2019. "Pedestrian dynamics in a heterogeneous bidirectional flow: Overtaking behaviour and lane formation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 72-84.
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0094351 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Stock, Eduardo Velasco & da Silva, Roberto, 2023. "Lattice gas model to describe a nightclub dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Varas, A. & Cornejo, M.D. & Mainemer, D. & Toledo, B. & Rogan, J. & Muñoz, V. & Valdivia, J.A., 2007. "Cellular automaton model for evacuation process with obstacles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 382(2), pages 631-642.
    8. Murilo S Baptista & Hai-Peng Ren & Johen C M Swarts & Rodrigo Carareto & Henk Nijmeijer & Celso Grebogi, 2012. "Collective Almost Synchronisation in Complex Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-11, November.
    9. Xianing Wang & Zhan Zhang & Ying Wang & Jun Yang & Linjun Lu, 2022. "A Study on Safety Evaluation of Pedestrian Flows Based on Partial Impact Dynamics by Real-Time Data in Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Chen, Changkun & Sun, Huakai & Lei, Peng & Zhao, Dongyue & Shi, Congling, 2021. "An extended model for crowd evacuation considering pedestrian panic in artificial attack," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    11. Michael Batty & Jake Desyllas & Elspeth Duxbury, 2003. "Safety in Numbers? Modelling Crowds and Designing Control for the Notting Hill Carnival," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(8), pages 1573-1590, July.
    12. Ma, Jian & Song, Wei-guo & Zhang, Jun & Lo, Siu-ming & Liao, Guang-xuan, 2010. "k-Nearest-Neighbor interaction induced self-organized pedestrian counter flow," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(10), pages 2101-2117.
    13. Illés J Farkas & Shuohong Wang, 2018. "Spatial flocking: Control by speed, distance, noise and delay," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, May.
    14. Zheng, Yaochen & Chen, Jianqiao & Wei, Junhong & Guo, Xiwei, 2012. "Modeling of pedestrian evacuation based on the particle swarm optimization algorithm," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(17), pages 4225-4233.
    15. Yue, Hao & Zhang, Junyao & Chen, Wenxin & Wu, Xinsen & Zhang, Xu & Shao, Chunfu, 2021. "Simulation of the influence of spatial obstacles on evacuation pedestrian flow in walking facilities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    16. Sungryong Bae & Jun-Ho Choi & Hong Sun Ryou, 2020. "Modification of Interaction Forces between Smoke and Evacuees," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-10, August.
    17. Lasse Pedersen, 2009. "When Everyone Runs for the Exit," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 5(4), pages 177-199, December.
    18. Shiwakoti, Nirajan & Sarvi, Majid, 2013. "Understanding pedestrian crowd panic: a review on model organisms approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 12-17.
    19. Ofer Tchernichovski & Marissa King & Peter Brinkmann & Xanadu Halkias & Daniel Fimiarz & Laurent Mars & Dalton Conley, 2017. "Tradeoff Between Distributed Social Learning and Herding Effect in Online Rating Systems," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440176, February.
    20. Krbálek, Milan & Hrabák, Pavel & Bukáček, Marek, 2018. "Pedestrian headways — Reflection of territorial social forces," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 38-49.
    21. Natalie Fridman & Gal A. Kaminka, 2010. "Modeling pedestrian crowd behavior based on a cognitive model of social comparison theory," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 348-372, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.