IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1008927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Embedding optimization reveals long-lasting history dependence in neural spiking activity

Author

Listed:
  • Lucas Rudelt
  • Daniel González Marx
  • Michael Wibral
  • Viola Priesemann

Abstract

Information processing can leave distinct footprints on the statistics of neural spiking. For example, efficient coding minimizes the statistical dependencies on the spiking history, while temporal integration of information may require the maintenance of information over different timescales. To investigate these footprints, we developed a novel approach to quantify history dependence within the spiking of a single neuron, using the mutual information between the entire past and current spiking. This measure captures how much past information is necessary to predict current spiking. In contrast, classical time-lagged measures of temporal dependence like the autocorrelation capture how long—potentially redundant—past information can still be read out. Strikingly, we find for model neurons that our method disentangles the strength and timescale of history dependence, whereas the two are mixed in classical approaches. When applying the method to experimental data, which are necessarily of limited size, a reliable estimation of mutual information is only possible for a coarse temporal binning of past spiking, a so-called past embedding. To still account for the vastly different spiking statistics and potentially long history dependence of living neurons, we developed an embedding-optimization approach that does not only vary the number and size, but also an exponential stretching of past bins. For extra-cellular spike recordings, we found that the strength and timescale of history dependence indeed can vary independently across experimental preparations. While hippocampus indicated strong and long history dependence, in visual cortex it was weak and short, while in vitro the history dependence was strong but short. This work enables an information-theoretic characterization of history dependence in recorded spike trains, which captures a footprint of information processing that is beyond time-lagged measures of temporal dependence. To facilitate the application of the method, we provide practical guidelines and a toolbox.Author summary: Even with exciting advances in recording techniques of neural spiking activity, experiments only provide a comparably short glimpse into the activity of only a tiny subset of all neurons. How can we learn from these experiments about the organization of information processing in the brain? To that end, we exploit that different properties of information processing leave distinct footprints on the firing statistics of individual spiking neurons. In our work, we focus on a particular statistical footprint: We quantify how much a single neuron’s spiking depends on its own preceding activity, which we call history dependence. By quantifying history dependence in neural spike recordings, one can, in turn, infer some of the properties of information processing. Because recording lengths are limited in practice, a direct estimation of history dependence from experiments is challenging. The embedding optimization approach that we present in this paper aims at extracting a maximum of history dependence within the limits set by a reliable estimation. The approach is highly adaptive and thereby enables a meaningful comparison of history dependence between neurons with vastly different spiking statistics, which we exemplify on a diversity of spike recordings. In conjunction with recent, highly parallel spike recording techniques, the approach could yield valuable insights on how hierarchical processing is organized in the brain.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas Rudelt & Daniel González Marx & Michael Wibral & Viola Priesemann, 2021. "Embedding optimization reveals long-lasting history dependence in neural spiking activity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-51, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008927
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008927
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008927&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. F. Wasmuht & E. Spaak & T. J. Buschman & E. K. Miller & M. G. Stokes, 2018. "Intrinsic neuronal dynamics predict distinct functional roles during working memory," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Jonathan W. Pillow & Jonathon Shlens & Liam Paninski & Alexander Sher & Alan M. Litke & E. J. Chichilnisky & Eero P. Simoncelli, 2008. "Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7207), pages 995-999, August.
    3. Sean E. Cavanagh & John P. Towers & Joni D. Wallis & Laurence T. Hunt & Steven W. Kennerley, 2018. "Reconciling persistent and dynamic hypotheses of working memory coding in prefrontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Chapeau-Blondeau, François, 2007. "Autocorrelation versus entropy-based autoinformation for measuring dependence in random signal," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 380(C), pages 1-18.
    5. Jens Wilting & Viola Priesemann, 2018. "Inferring collective dynamical states from widely unobserved systems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.
    6. Jason S Prentice & Olivier Marre & Mark L Ioffe & Adrianna R Loback & Gašper Tkačik & Michael J Berry II, 2016. "Error-Robust Modes of the Retinal Population Code," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. F P Spitzner & J Dehning & J Wilting & A Hagemann & J P. Neto & J Zierenberg & V Priesemann, 2021. "MR. Estimator, a toolbox to determine intrinsic timescales from subsampled spiking activity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Jan Humplik & Gašper Tkačik, 2017. "Probabilistic models for neural populations that naturally capture global coupling and criticality," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Arne F Meyer & Jan-Philipp Diepenbrock & Max F K Happel & Frank W Ohl & Jörn Anemüller, 2014. "Discriminative Learning of Receptive Fields from Responses to Non-Gaussian Stimulus Ensembles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Mark L Ioffe & Michael J Berry II, 2017. "The structured ‘low temperature’ phase of the retinal population code," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-31, October.
    5. Jonathan Rubin & Nachum Ulanovsky & Israel Nelken & Naftali Tishby, 2016. "The Representation of Prediction Error in Auditory Cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-28, August.
    6. Franklin Leong & Babak Rahmani & Demetri Psaltis & Christophe Moser & Diego Ghezzi, 2024. "An actor-model framework for visual sensory encoding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Pengcheng Zhou & Shawn D Burton & Adam C Snyder & Matthew A Smith & Nathaniel N Urban & Robert E Kass, 2015. "Establishing a Statistical Link between Network Oscillations and Neural Synchrony," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Richard Naud & Wulfram Gerstner, 2012. "Coding and Decoding with Adapting Neurons: A Population Approach to the Peri-Stimulus Time Histogram," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Contreras, Sebastian & Oróstica, Karen Y. & Daza-Sanchez, Anamaria & Wagner, Joel & Dönges, Philipp & Medina-Ortiz, David & Jara, Matias & Verdugo, Ricardo & Conca, Carlos & Priesemann, Viola & Oliver, 2023. "Model-based assessment of sampling protocols for infectious disease genomic surveillance," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Benoit Duchet & Filippo Ghezzi & Gihan Weerasinghe & Gerd Tinkhauser & Andrea A Kühn & Peter Brown & Christian Bick & Rafal Bogacz, 2021. "Average beta burst duration profiles provide a signature of dynamical changes between the ON and OFF medication states in Parkinson’s disease," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-42, July.
    11. Kenneth W. Latimer & David J. Freedman, 2023. "Low-dimensional encoding of decisions in parietal cortex reflects long-term training history," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    12. Braden A W Brinkman & Alison I Weber & Fred Rieke & Eric Shea-Brown, 2016. "How Do Efficient Coding Strategies Depend on Origins of Noise in Neural Circuits?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-34, October.
    13. Jason S Prentice & Olivier Marre & Mark L Ioffe & Adrianna R Loback & Gašper Tkačik & Michael J Berry II, 2016. "Error-Robust Modes of the Retinal Population Code," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-32, November.
    14. Yanyun Ren & Xiaobo Bu & Ming Wang & Yue Gong & Junjie Wang & Yuyang Yang & Guijun Li & Meng Zhang & Ye Zhou & Su-Ting Han, 2022. "Synaptic plasticity in self-powered artificial striate cortex for binocular orientation selectivity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Urs Köster & Jascha Sohl-Dickstein & Charles M Gray & Bruno A Olshausen, 2014. "Modeling Higher-Order Correlations within Cortical Microcolumns," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    16. Philip A. White & Alan E. Gelfand, 2021. "Generalized Evolutionary Point Processes: Model Specifications and Model Comparison," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1001-1021, September.
    17. Michael E Rule & David Schnoerr & Matthias H Hennig & Guido Sanguinetti, 2019. "Neural field models for latent state inference: Application to large-scale neuronal recordings," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, November.
    18. Martin J M Lankheet & P Christiaan Klink & Bart G Borghuis & André J Noest, 2012. "Spike-Interval Triggered Averaging Reveals a Quasi-Periodic Spiking Alternative for Stochastic Resonance in Catfish Electroreceptors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-11, March.
    19. Liangyu Tao & Samuel P. Wechsler & Vikas Bhandawat, 2023. "Sensorimotor transformation underlying odor-modulated locomotion in walking Drosophila," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Srdjan Ostojic & Nicolas Brunel, 2011. "From Spiking Neuron Models to Linear-Nonlinear Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.