IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MHC binding affects the dynamics of different T-cell receptors in different ways

Author

Listed:
  • Bernhard Knapp
  • P Anton van der Merwe
  • Omer Dushek
  • Charlotte M Deane

Abstract

T cells use their T-cell receptors (TCRs) to scan other cells for antigenic peptides presented by MHC molecules (pMHC). If a TCR encounters a pMHC, it can trigger a signalling pathway that could lead to the activation of the T cell and the initiation of an immune response. It is currently not clear how the binding of pMHC to the TCR initiates signalling within the T cell. One hypothesis is that conformational changes in the TCR lead to further downstream signalling. Here we investigate four different TCRs in their free state as well as in their pMHC bound state using large scale molecular simulations totalling 26 000 ns. We find that the dynamical features within TCRs differ significantly between unbound TCR and TCR/pMHC simulations. However, apart from expected results such as reduced solvent accessibility and flexibility of the interface residues, these features are not conserved among different TCR types. The presence of a pMHC alone is not sufficient to cause cross-TCR-conserved dynamical features within a TCR. Our results argue against models of TCR triggering involving conserved allosteric conformational changes.Author summary: The interaction between T-cells and other cells is one of the most important interactions in the human immune system. If T-cells are not triggered major parts of the immune system cannot be activated or are not working effectively. Despite many years of research the exact mechanism of how a T-cell is initially triggered is not clear. One hypothesis is that conformational changes within the T-cell receptor (TCR) can cause further downstream signalling within the T-cell. In this study we computationally investigate the dynamics of four different TCRs in their free and bound configuration. Our large scale simulations show that all four TCRs react to binding in different ways. In some TCRs mainly the areas close to the binding region are affected while in other TCRs areas further apart from the binding region are also affected. Our results argue against a conserved structural activation mechanism across different types of TCRs.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernhard Knapp & P Anton van der Merwe & Omer Dushek & Charlotte M Deane, 2019. "MHC binding affects the dynamics of different T-cell receptors in different ways," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007338
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007338
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007338&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monya Baker, 2012. "On the edge," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7400), pages 672-672, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wilding, Thomas A. & Gill, Andrew B. & Boon, Arjen & Sheehan, Emma & Dauvin, Jean–Claude & Pezy, Jean-Philippe & O’Beirn, Francis & Janas, Urszula & Rostin, Liis & De Mesel, Ilse, 2017. "Turning off the DRIP (‘Data-rich, information-poor’) – rationalising monitoring with a focus on marine renewable energy developments and the benthos," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 848-859.
    2. Jeff Miller & Rolf Ulrich, 2019. "The quest for an optimal alpha," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Grant G. Thompson & Lynn A. Maguire & Tracey J. Regan, 2018. "Evaluation of Two Approaches to Defining Extinction Risk under the U.S. Endangered Species Act," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 1009-1035, May.
    4. Janet Aisbett & Eric J. Drinkwater & Kenneth L. Quarrie & Stephen Woodcock, 2023. "Applying generalized funnel plots to help design statistical analyses," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 355-364, February.
    5. Adeeba Khan & Syed Muhammad Mehdi Raza Naqvi, 2019. "Anticipated Tuberculosis Stigmatized Identities and Deviant Workplace Behavior: A Moderated Mediated Model in Pakistan," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(1), pages 87-95, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.