IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drosophila melanogaster grooming possesses syntax with distinct rules at different temporal scales

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua M Mueller
  • Primoz Ravbar
  • Julie H Simpson
  • Jean M Carlson

Abstract

Mathematical modeling of behavioral sequences yields insight into the rules and mechanisms underlying sequence generation. Grooming in Drosophila melanogaster is characterized by repeated execution of distinct, stereotyped actions in variable order. Experiments demonstrate that, following stimulation by an irritant, grooming progresses gradually from an early phase dominated by anterior cleaning to a later phase with increased walking and posterior cleaning. We also observe that, at an intermediate temporal scale, there is a strong relationship between the amount of time spent performing body-directed grooming actions and leg-directed actions. We then develop a series of data-driven Markov models that isolate and identify the behavioral features governing transitions between individual grooming bouts. We identify action order as the primary driver of probabilistic, but non-random, syntax structure, as has previously been identified. Subsequent models incorporate grooming bout duration, which also contributes significantly to sequence structure. Our results show that, surprisingly, the syntactic rules underlying probabilistic grooming transitions possess action duration-dependent structure, suggesting that sensory input-independent mechanisms guide grooming behavior at short time scales. Finally, the inclusion of a simple rule that modifies grooming transition probabilities over time yields a generative model that recapitulates the key features of observed grooming sequences at several time scales. These discoveries suggest that sensory input guides action selection by modulating internally generated dynamics. Additionally, the discovery of these principles governing grooming in D. melanogaster demonstrates the utility of incorporating temporal information when characterizing the syntax of behavioral sequences.Author summary: Analysis of temporally rich behavioral sequences provides a quantitative description of the rules underlying their generation. Drosophila melanogaster grooming behavior consists of many complex sequences involving repetitions of well-characterized actions. In this paper, we leverage advances in machine vision to automatically annotate over 40 hours of video data of flies covered in dust and develop mathematical models that reveal the existence of syntax in D. melanogaster grooming. We find that sequence organization depends on grooming action identity, as has been well-established, and, more surprisingly, grooming action duration. The discovery of duration-dependent action selection leads us to conclude that, although sensory input informs grooming decisions on long time scales, internal dynamics also guide individual transitions between grooming actions. Therefore, incorporating action duration into our models allows us to uncover multi-scale temporal dynamics that suggest the existence of neural circuits dedicated to partially sensory-independent decision-making. Our approach highlights the importance of incorporating temporal information into sequential models, as doing so reveals the relative contributions of sensory input and internal dynamics to behavioral sequence generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua M Mueller & Primoz Ravbar & Julie H Simpson & Jean M Carlson, 2019. "Drosophila melanogaster grooming possesses syntax with distinct rules at different temporal scales," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007105
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007105&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maximiliano L. Suster & Michael Bate, 2002. "Embryonic assembly of a central pattern generator without sensory input," Nature, Nature, vol. 416(6877), pages 174-178, March.
    2. Kentaro Katahira & Kenta Suzuki & Kazuo Okanoya & Masato Okada, 2011. "Complex Sequencing Rules of Birdsong Can be Explained by Simple Hidden Markov Processes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-9, September.
    3. Michael A. Long & Dezhe Z. Jin & Michale S. Fee, 2010. "Support for a synaptic chain model of neuronal sequence generation," Nature, Nature, vol. 468(7322), pages 394-399, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katerina Karkali & Samuel W. Vernon & Richard A. Baines & George Panayotou & Enrique Martín-Blanco, 2023. "Puckered and JNK signaling in pioneer neurons coordinates the motor activity of the Drosophila embryo," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Matthew A Slayton & Juan L Romero-Sosa & Katrina Shore & Dean V Buonomano & Indre V Viskontas, 2020. "Musical expertise generalizes to superior temporal scaling in a Morse code tapping task," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, January.
    3. A. Barri & M. T. Wiechert & M. Jazayeri & D. A. DiGregorio, 2022. "Synaptic basis of a sub-second representation of time in a neural circuit model," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Sravani Kondapavulur & Stefan M. Lemke & David Darevsky & Ling Guo & Preeya Khanna & Karunesh Ganguly, 2022. "Transition from predictable to variable motor cortex and striatal ensemble patterning during behavioral exploration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Tim Sainburg & Marvin Thielk & Timothy Q Gentner, 2020. "Finding, visualizing, and quantifying latent structure across diverse animal vocal repertoires," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-48, October.
    6. William H Barnett & Gennady S Cymbalyuk, 2014. "A Codimension-2 Bifurcation Controlling Endogenous Bursting Activity and Pulse-Triggered Responses of a Neuron Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Shuang Qiu & Chengfeng Xiao & R Meldrum Robertson, 2016. "Pulsed Light Stimulation Increases Boundary Preference and Periodicity of Episodic Motor Activity in Drosophila melanogaster," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Satohiro Tajima & Toru Yanagawa & Naotaka Fujii & Taro Toyoizumi, 2015. "Untangling Brain-Wide Dynamics in Consciousness by Cross-Embedding," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-28, November.
    9. Alex P. Vaz & John H. Wittig & Sara K. Inati & Kareem A. Zaghloul, 2023. "Backbone spiking sequence as a basis for preplay, replay, and default states in human cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.