IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Markov chain for numerical chromosomal instability in clonally expanding populations

Author

Listed:
  • Sergi Elizalde
  • Ashley M Laughney
  • Samuel F Bakhoum

Abstract

Cancer cells frequently undergo chromosome missegregation events during mitosis, whereby the copies of a given chromosome are not distributed evenly among the two daughter cells, thus creating cells with heterogeneous karyotypes. A stochastic model tracing cellular karyotypes derived from clonal populations over hundreds of generations was recently developed and experimentally validated, and it was capable of predicting favorable karyotypes frequently observed in cancer. Here, we construct and study a Markov chain that precisely describes karyotypic evolution during clonally expanding cancer cell populations. The Markov chain allows us to directly predict the distribution of karyotypes and the expected size of the tumor after many cell divisions without resorting to computationally expensive simulations. We determine the limiting karyotype distribution of an evolving tumor population, and quantify its dependency on several key parameters including the initial karyotype of the founder cell, the rate of whole chromosome missegregation, and chromosome-specific cell viability. Using this model, we confirm the existence of an optimal rate of chromosome missegregation probabilities that maximizes karyotypic heterogeneity, while minimizing the occurrence of nullisomy. Interestingly, karyotypic heterogeneity is significantly more dependent on chromosome missegregation probabilities rather than the number of cell divisions, so that maximal heterogeneity can be reached rapidly (within a few hundred generations of cell division) at chromosome missegregation rates commonly observed in cancer cell lines. Conversely, at low missegregation rates, heterogeneity is constrained even after thousands of cell division events. This leads us to conclude that chromosome copy number heterogeneity is primarily constrained by chromosome missegregation rates and the risk for nullisomy and less so by the age of the tumor. This model enables direct integration of karyotype information into existing models of tumor evolution based on somatic mutations.Author summary: Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a hallmark of cancer and it results from persistent chromosome segregation errors during cell division. CIN has been shown to play a key role in drug resistance and tumor metastasis. While our understanding of CIN on the cellular level has grown over the past decade, our ability to predict the behavior of tumors containing billions of cells remains limited due to the paucity of adequate mathematical models. Here, we develop a Markov-chain model that is capable of providing exact solutions for long-term chromosome copy number distributions during tumor growth. Using this model we confirm the presence of optimal chromosome missegregation rates that balance genomic heterogeneity required for tumor evolution and survival. Interestingly, we show that chromosome copy number heterogeneity is primarily influenced by the rate of chromosome segregation errors rather than the age of the tumor. At chromosome missegregation rates frequently observed in cancer, tumors can acquire maximal genomic heterogeneity after a few hundred cell divisions. This model enables the integration of selection imparted by CIN into existing models of tumor evolution based on somatic mutations to explore their mutual effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergi Elizalde & Ashley M Laughney & Samuel F Bakhoum, 2018. "A Markov chain for numerical chromosomal instability in clonally expanding populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006447
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006447
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006447&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006447?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christoph Lengauer & Kenneth W. Kinzler & Bert Vogelstein, 1998. "Genetic instabilities in human cancers," Nature, Nature, vol. 396(6712), pages 643-649, December.
    2. C. Lengauer & K. W. Kinzler & B. Vogelstein, 1997. "Genetic instability in colorectal cancers," Nature, Nature, vol. 386(6625), pages 623-627, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Zhao & Franziska Michor, 2013. "Patterns of Proliferative Activity in the Colonic Crypt Determine Crypt Stability and Rates of Somatic Evolution," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Zimo Yang & Tao Zhou & Pak Ming Hui & Jian-Hong Ke, 2012. "Instability in Evolutionary Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-9, November.
    3. Signe Penner-Goeke & Zelda Lichtensztejn & Megan Neufeld & Jennifer L Ali & Alon D Altman & Mark W Nachtigal & Kirk J McManus, 2017. "The temporal dynamics of chromosome instability in ovarian cancer cell lines and primary patient samples," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    4. van Wieringen Wessel N. & van de Wiel Mark A., 2014. "Penalized differential pathway analysis of integrative oncogenomics studies," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 141-158, April.
    5. Weissman, Daniel B. & Desai, Michael M. & Fisher, Daniel S. & Feldman, Marcus W., 2009. "The rate at which asexual populations cross fitness valleys," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 75(4), pages 286-300.
    6. Paul R. Rosenbaum, 2004. "The Case-Only Odds Ratio as a Causal Parameter," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 233-240, March.
    7. Beibei Ru & Jinlin Huang & Yu Zhang & Kenneth Aldape & Peng Jiang, 2023. "Estimation of cell lineages in tumors from spatial transcriptomics data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Yoon Hee Cho & Su Young Kim & Hae Dong Woo & Yang Jee Kim & Sung Whan Ha & Hai Won Chung, 2015. "Delayed Numerical Chromosome Aberrations in Human Fibroblasts by Low Dose of Radiation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Xia Li & Xiaoping Yao & Yibaina Wang & Fulan Hu & Fan Wang & Liying Jiang & Yupeng Liu & Da Wang & Guizhi Sun & Yashuang Zhao, 2013. "MLH1 Promoter Methylation Frequency in Colorectal Cancer Patients and Related Clinicopathological and Molecular Features," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-9, March.
    10. Simão, Éder M. & Cabral, Heleno B. & Castro, Mauro A.A. & Sinigaglia, Marialva & Mombach, José C.M. & Librelotto, Giovani R., 2010. "Modeling the Human Genome Maintenance network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(19), pages 4188-4194.
    11. Weifeng Tang & Hao Qiu & Hao Ding & Bin Sun & Lixin Wang & Jun Yin & Haiyong Gu, 2013. "Association between the STK15 F31I Polymorphism and Cancer Susceptibility: A Meta-Analysis Involving 43,626 Subjects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-1, December.
    12. Fenglong Bie & Zhijie Wang & Yulong Li & Wei Guo & Yuanyuan Hong & Tiancheng Han & Fang Lv & Shunli Yang & Suxing Li & Xi Li & Peiyao Nie & Shun Xu & Ruochuan Zang & Moyan Zhang & Peng Song & Feiyue F, 2023. "Multimodal analysis of cell-free DNA whole-methylome sequencing for cancer detection and localization," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.