IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Beat-to-Beat Variability of Repolarization Duration in the Canine Ventricular Myocyte: A Computational Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jordi Heijman
  • Antonio Zaza
  • Daniel M Johnson
  • Yoram Rudy
  • Ralf L M Peeters
  • Paul G A Volders
  • Ronald L Westra

Abstract

Beat-to-beat variability of repolarization duration (BVR) is an intrinsic characteristic of cardiac function and a better marker of proarrhythmia than repolarization prolongation alone. The ionic mechanisms underlying baseline BVR in physiological conditions, its rate dependence, and the factors contributing to increased BVR in pathologies remain incompletely understood. Here, we employed computer modeling to provide novel insights into the subcellular mechanisms of BVR under physiological conditions and during simulated drug-induced repolarization prolongation, mimicking long-QT syndromes type 1, 2, and 3. We developed stochastic implementations of 13 major ionic currents and fluxes in a model of canine ventricular-myocyte electrophysiology. Combined stochastic gating of these components resulted in short- and long-term variability, consistent with experimental data from isolated canine ventricular myocytes. The model indicated that the magnitude of stochastic fluctuations is rate dependent due to the rate dependence of action-potential (AP) duration (APD). This process (the “active” component) and the intrinsic nonlinear relationship between membrane current and APD (“intrinsic component”) contribute to the rate dependence of BVR. We identified a major role in physiological BVR for stochastic gating of the persistent Na+ current (INa) and rapidly activating delayed-rectifier K+ current (IKr). Inhibition of IKr or augmentation of INa significantly increased BVR, whereas subsequent β-adrenergic receptor stimulation reduced it, similar to experimental findings in isolated myocytes. In contrast, β-adrenergic stimulation increased BVR in simulated long-QT syndrome type 1. In addition to stochastic channel gating, AP morphology, APD, and beat-to-beat variations in Ca2+ were found to modulate single-cell BVR. Cell-to-cell coupling decreased BVR and this was more pronounced when a model cell with increased BVR was coupled to a model cell with normal BVR. In conclusion, our results provide new insights into the ionic mechanisms underlying BVR and suggest that BVR reflects multiple potentially proarrhythmic parameters, including increased ion-channel stochasticity, prolonged APD, and abnormal Ca2+ handling.Author Summary: Every heartbeat has an electrical recovery (repolarization) interval that varies in duration from beat to beat. Excessive beat-to-beat variability of repolarization duration has been shown to be a risk marker of potentially fatal heart-rhythm disorders, but the contributing subcellular mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Computational models have greatly enhanced our understanding of several basic electrophysiological mechanisms. We developed a detailed computer model of the ventricular myocyte that can simulate beat-to-beat changes in repolarization duration by taking into account stochastic changes in the opening and closing of individual ion channels responsible for all main ion currents. The model accurately reproduced experimental data from isolated myocytes under both physiological and pathological conditions. Using the model, we identified several mechanisms contributing to repolarization variability, including stochastic gating of ion channels, duration and morphology of the repolarization phase, and intracellular calcium handling, thereby providing insights into its basis as a proarrhythmic marker. Our computer model provides a detailed framework to study the dynamics of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias.

Suggested Citation

  • Jordi Heijman & Antonio Zaza & Daniel M Johnson & Yoram Rudy & Ralf L M Peeters & Paul G A Volders & Ronald L Westra, 2013. "Determinants of Beat-to-Beat Variability of Repolarization Duration in the Canine Ventricular Myocyte: A Computational Analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003202
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003202
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003202&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher V. Rao & Denise M. Wolf & Adam P. Arkin, 2002. "Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise," Nature, Nature, vol. 420(6912), pages 231-237, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junjie Luo & Jun Wang & Ting Martin Ma & Zhirong Sun, 2010. "Reverse Engineering of Bacterial Chemotaxis Pathway via Frequency Domain Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-8, March.
    2. Ankit Gupta & Mustafa Khammash, 2022. "Frequency spectra and the color of cellular noise," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Burton W Andrews & Pablo A Iglesias, 2007. "An Information-Theoretic Characterization of the Optimal Gradient Sensing Response of Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-9, August.
    4. Arantxa Urchueguía & Luca Galbusera & Dany Chauvin & Gwendoline Bellement & Thomas Julou & Erik van Nimwegen, 2021. "Genome-wide gene expression noise in Escherichia coli is condition-dependent and determined by propagation of noise through the regulatory network," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Mark Hallen & Bochong Li & Yu Tanouchi & Cheemeng Tan & Mike West & Lingchong You, 2011. "Computation of Steady-State Probability Distributions in Stochastic Models of Cellular Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-16, October.
    6. David M Holloway & Francisco J P Lopes & Luciano da Fontoura Costa & Bruno A N Travençolo & Nina Golyandina & Konstantin Usevich & Alexander V Spirov, 2011. "Gene Expression Noise in Spatial Patterning: hunchback Promoter Structure Affects Noise Amplitude and Distribution in Drosophila Segmentation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Ankit Gupta & Corentin Briat & Mustafa Khammash, 2014. "A Scalable Computational Framework for Establishing Long-Term Behavior of Stochastic Reaction Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Lucia Marucci & David A W Barton & Irene Cantone & Maria Aurelia Ricci & Maria Pia Cosma & Stefania Santini & Diego di Bernardo & Mario di Bernardo, 2009. "How to Turn a Genetic Circuit into a Synthetic Tunable Oscillator, or a Bistable Switch," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(12), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Singh, Shakti Nath & Chanu, Athokpam Langlen & Malik, Md. Zubbair & Singh, R.K. Brojen, 2021. "Interplay of cellular states: Role of delay as control mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 572(C).
    10. Thounaojam, Umeshkanta Singh, 2022. "Stochastic chaos in chemical Lorenz system: Interplay of intrinsic noise and nonlinearity," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    11. Shuangyu Bi & Manika Kargeti & Remy Colin & Niklas Farke & Hannes Link & Victor Sourjik, 2023. "Dynamic fluctuations in a bacterial metabolic network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Burton W Andrews & Tau-Mu Yi & Pablo A Iglesias, 2006. "Optimal Noise Filtering in the Chemotactic Response of Escherichia coli," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-12, November.
    13. Benjamin B Kaufmann & Qiong Yang & Jerome T Mettetal & Alexander van Oudenaarden, 2007. "Heritable Stochastic Switching Revealed by Single-Cell Genealogy," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-8, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.