IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3001633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neural networks enable efficient and accurate simulation-based inference of evolutionary parameters from adaptation dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Grace Avecilla
  • Julie N Chuong
  • Fangfei Li
  • Gavin Sherlock
  • David Gresham
  • Yoav Ram

Abstract

The rate of adaptive evolution depends on the rate at which beneficial mutations are introduced into a population and the fitness effects of those mutations. The rate of beneficial mutations and their expected fitness effects is often difficult to empirically quantify. As these 2 parameters determine the pace of evolutionary change in a population, the dynamics of adaptive evolution may enable inference of their values. Copy number variants (CNVs) are a pervasive source of heritable variation that can facilitate rapid adaptive evolution. Previously, we developed a locus-specific fluorescent CNV reporter to quantify CNV dynamics in evolving populations maintained in nutrient-limiting conditions using chemostats. Here, we use CNV adaptation dynamics to estimate the rate at which beneficial CNVs are introduced through de novo mutation and their fitness effects using simulation-based likelihood–free inference approaches. We tested the suitability of 2 evolutionary models: a standard Wright–Fisher model and a chemostat model. We evaluated 2 likelihood-free inference algorithms: the well-established Approximate Bayesian Computation with Sequential Monte Carlo (ABC-SMC) algorithm, and the recently developed Neural Posterior Estimation (NPE) algorithm, which applies an artificial neural network to directly estimate the posterior distribution. By systematically evaluating the suitability of different inference methods and models, we show that NPE has several advantages over ABC-SMC and that a Wright–Fisher evolutionary model suffices in most cases. Using our validated inference framework, we estimate the CNV formation rate at the GAP1 locus in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to be 10−4.7 to 10−4 CNVs per cell division and a fitness coefficient of 0.04 to 0.1 per generation for GAP1 CNVs in glutamine-limited chemostats. We experimentally validated our inference-based estimates using 2 distinct experimental methods—barcode lineage tracking and pairwise fitness assays—which provide independent confirmation of the accuracy of our approach. Our results are consistent with a beneficial CNV supply rate that is 10-fold greater than the estimated rates of beneficial single-nucleotide mutations, explaining the outsized importance of CNVs in rapid adaptive evolution. More generally, our study demonstrates the utility of novel neural network–based likelihood–free inference methods for inferring the rates and effects of evolutionary processes from empirical data with possible applications ranging from tumor to viral evolution.This study shows that simulation-based inference of evolutionary dynamics using neural networks can yield parameter values for fitness and mutation rate that are difficult to determine experimentally, including those of copy number variants (CNVs) during experimental adaptive evolution of yeast.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace Avecilla & Julie N Chuong & Fangfei Li & Gavin Sherlock & David Gresham & Yoav Ram, 2022. "Neural networks enable efficient and accurate simulation-based inference of evolutionary parameters from adaptation dynamics," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-32, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001633
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001633
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001633&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R Craig MacLean & Angus Buckling, 2009. "The Distribution of Fitness Effects of Beneficial Mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-7, March.
    2. Jens Frickel & Philine G. D. Feulner & Emre Karakoc & Lutz Becks, 2018. "Population size changes and selection drive patterns of parallel evolution in a host–virus system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Wei & Sehgal, Vasudha & Dinh, Duy M. & Azevedo, Ricardo B.R. & Cooper, Tim F. & Azencott, Robert, 2012. "Estimation of the rate and effect of new beneficial mutations in asexual populations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 168-178.
    2. Durrett, Rick & Foo, Jasmine & Leder, Kevin & Mayberry, John & Michor, Franziska, 2010. "Evolutionary dynamics of tumor progression with random fitness values," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 54-66.
    3. Rendel, Mark D., 2011. "Adaptive evolutionary walks require neutral intermediates in RNA fitness landscapes," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 12-18.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.