IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3000956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cross-institutional analysis of the effects of broadening trainee professional development on research productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick D Brandt
  • Susi Sturzenegger Varvayanis
  • Tracey Baas
  • Amanda F Bolgioni
  • Janet Alder
  • Kimberly A Petrie
  • Isabel Dominguez
  • Abigail M Brown
  • C Abigail Stayart
  • Harinder Singh
  • Audra Van Wart
  • Christine S Chow
  • Ambika Mathur
  • Barbara M Schreiber
  • David A Fruman
  • Brent Bowden
  • Christopher A Wiesen
  • Yvonne M Golightly
  • Chris E Holmquist
  • Daniel Arneman
  • Joshua D Hall
  • Linda E Hyman
  • Kathleen L Gould
  • Roger Chalkley
  • Patrick J Brennwald
  • Rebekah L Layton

Abstract

PhD-trained scientists are essential contributors to the workforce in diverse employment sectors that include academia, industry, government, and nonprofit organizations. Hence, best practices for training the future biomedical workforce are of national concern. Complementing coursework and laboratory research training, many institutions now offer professional training that enables career exploration and develops a broad set of skills critical to various career paths. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded academic institutions to design innovative programming to enable this professional development through a mechanism known as Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST). Programming at the NIH BEST awardee institutions included career panels, skill-building workshops, job search workshops, site visits, and internships. Because doctoral training is lengthy and requires focused attention on dissertation research, an initial concern was that students participating in additional complementary training activities might exhibit an increased time to degree or diminished research productivity. Metrics were analyzed from 10 NIH BEST awardee institutions to address this concern, using time to degree and publication records as measures of efficiency and productivity. Comparing doctoral students who participated to those who did not, results revealed that across these diverse academic institutions, there were no differences in time to degree or manuscript output. Our findings support the policy that doctoral students should participate in career and professional development opportunities that are intended to prepare them for a variety of diverse and important careers in the workforce.Will an internship during PhD training lengthen the time taken to complete the degree or hamper research productivity? Data from 10 institutions and over 1700 life science PhD trainees who participated in different amounts of professional development revealed that there were no significant differences in trainee productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick D Brandt & Susi Sturzenegger Varvayanis & Tracey Baas & Amanda F Bolgioni & Janet Alder & Kimberly A Petrie & Isabel Dominguez & Abigail M Brown & C Abigail Stayart & Harinder Singh & Audra Va, 2021. "A cross-institutional analysis of the effects of broadening trainee professional development on research productivity," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000956
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000956
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000956&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcus Munafò, 2021. "Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-3, July.
    2. Bunmi Isaiah Omodan, 2023. "Addressing the Dark Side of Leadership in the University System Using Community of Practice (CoP) Approach," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.