IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3000182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolthon: A community endeavor to evolve lab evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Sivan Kaminski Strauss
  • Dvir Schirman
  • Ghil Jona
  • Aaron N Brooks
  • Aditya M Kunjapur
  • Alex N Nguyen Ba
  • Alice Flint
  • Andras Solt
  • Andreas Mershin
  • Atray Dixit
  • Avihu H Yona
  • Bálint Csörgő
  • Bede Phillip Busby
  • Bianca P Hennig
  • Csaba Pál
  • Daniel Schraivogel
  • Daniel Schultz
  • David G Wernick
  • Deepa Agashe
  • Dikla Levi
  • Dmitry Zabezhinsky
  • Dor Russ
  • Ehud Sass
  • Einat Tamar
  • Elad Herz
  • Emmanuel D Levy
  • George M Church
  • Idan Yelin
  • Iftach Nachman
  • Jeffrey E Gerst
  • Joseph M Georgeson
  • Katarzyna P Adamala
  • Lars M Steinmetz
  • Marc Rübsam
  • Markus Ralser
  • Michael Klutstein
  • Michael M Desai
  • Nilima Walunjkar
  • Ning Yin
  • Noa Aharon Hefetz
  • Noah Jakimo
  • Olga Snitser
  • Omri Adini
  • Prashant Kumar
  • Rachel Soo Hoo Smith
  • Razi Zeidan
  • Ronen Hazan
  • Roni Rak
  • Roy Kishony
  • Shannon Johnson
  • Shira Nouriel
  • Sibylle C Vonesch
  • Simmie Foster
  • Tal Dagan
  • Tanita Wein
  • Thrasyvoulos Karydis
  • Timothy M Wannier
  • Timothy Stiles
  • Viridiana Olin-Sandoval
  • William F Mueller
  • Yinon M Bar-On
  • Orna Dahan
  • Yitzhak Pilpel

Abstract

In experimental evolution, scientists evolve organisms in the lab, typically by challenging them to new environmental conditions. How best to evolve a desired trait? Should the challenge be applied abruptly, gradually, periodically, sporadically? Should one apply chemical mutagenesis, and do strains with high innate mutation rate evolve faster? What are ideal population sizes of evolving populations? There are endless strategies, beyond those that can be exposed by individual labs. We therefore arranged a community challenge, Evolthon, in which students and scientists from different labs were asked to evolve Escherichia coli or Saccharomyces cerevisiae for an abiotic stress—low temperature. About 30 participants from around the world explored diverse environmental and genetic regimes of evolution. After a period of evolution in each lab, all strains of each species were competed with one another. In yeast, the most successful strategies were those that used mating, underscoring the importance of sex in evolution. In bacteria, the fittest strain used a strategy based on exploration of different mutation rates. Different strategies displayed variable levels of performance and stability across additional challenges and conditions. This study therefore uncovers principles of effective experimental evolutionary regimens and might prove useful also for biotechnological developments of new strains and for understanding natural strategies in evolutionary arms races between species. Evolthon constitutes a model for community-based scientific exploration that encourages creativity and cooperation.This Community Page article describes Evolthon; a first-of-its-kind community-based effort, involving about 30 participant labs around the world, aiming to explore the best strategy for evolving microorganisms to cope with an environmental challenge.

Suggested Citation

  • Sivan Kaminski Strauss & Dvir Schirman & Ghil Jona & Aaron N Brooks & Aditya M Kunjapur & Alex N Nguyen Ba & Alice Flint & Andras Solt & Andreas Mershin & Atray Dixit & Avihu H Yona & Bálint Csörgő & , 2019. "Evolthon: A community endeavor to evolve lab evolution," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000182
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000182
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000182&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.