IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/2003354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Control of recollection by slow gamma dominating mid-frequency gamma in hippocampus CA1

Author

Listed:
  • Dino Dvorak
  • Basma Radwan
  • Fraser T Sparks
  • Zoe Nicole Talbot
  • André A Fenton

Abstract

Behavior is used to assess memory and cognitive deficits in animals like Fmr1-null mice that model Fragile X Syndrome, but behavior is a proxy for unknown neural events that define cognitive variables like recollection. We identified an electrophysiological signature of recollection in mouse dorsal Cornu Ammonis 1 (CA1) hippocampus. During a shocked-place avoidance task, slow gamma (SG) (30–50 Hz) dominates mid-frequency gamma (MG) (70–90 Hz) oscillations 2–3 s before successful avoidance, but not failures. Wild-type (WT) but not Fmr1-null mice rapidly adapt to relocating the shock; concurrently, SG/MG maxima (SGdom) decrease in WT but not in cognitively inflexible Fmr1-null mice. During SGdom, putative pyramidal cell ensembles represent distant locations; during place avoidance, these are avoided places. During shock relocation, WT ensembles represent distant locations near the currently correct shock zone, but Fmr1-null ensembles represent the formerly correct zone. These findings indicate that recollection occurs when CA1 SG dominates MG and that accurate recollection of inappropriate memories explains Fmr1-null cognitive inflexibility.Author summary: Behavior is often used as proxy to study memory and cognitive deficits in animals like Fmr1-KO mice that model Fragile X Syndrome, the most prevalent single-gene cause of intellectual disability and autism. However, it is unclear what neural events define cognitive variables like recollection of memory and cognitive inflexibility. We identified a signature of recollection in the local field potentials of mouse dorsal CA1 hippocampus. When mice on a rotating platform avoided an invisible, fixed shock zone, slow gamma (30–50 Hz) oscillations dominated mid-frequency gamma (70–90 Hz) oscillations (SGdom) 2–3 s before mice successfully avoided the shock zone. Wild-type but not Fmr1-KO mice adapt to relocating the shock zone; concurrently, SGdom decreases in wild-type but not in cognitively inflexible Fmr1-KO mice. During SGdom, principal cell ensembles represent distant locations; during place avoidance, these are avoided places in the shock zone vicinity. During shock relocation, wild-type ensembles encode distant locations near the currently correct shock zone, but Fmr1-KO ensembles manifest representational inflexibility, encoding the formerly correct zone. These findings suggest evidence for competition amongst CA1 inputs for CA1 information-processing modes and indicate that recollection occurs when CA1 slow gamma dominates mid-frequency gamma and that accurate recollection of inappropriate memories explains Fmr1-KO cognitive inflexibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Dino Dvorak & Basma Radwan & Fraser T Sparks & Zoe Nicole Talbot & André A Fenton, 2018. "Control of recollection by slow gamma dominating mid-frequency gamma in hippocampus CA1," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:2003354
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2003354
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2003354&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Lee Colgin & Tobias Denninger & Marianne Fyhn & Torkel Hafting & Tora Bonnevie & Ole Jensen & May-Britt Moser & Edvard I. Moser, 2009. "Frequency of gamma oscillations routes flow of information in the hippocampus," Nature, Nature, vol. 462(7271), pages 353-357, November.
    2. Kenneth Kay & Marielena Sosa & Jason E. Chung & Mattias P. Karlsson & Margaret C. Larkin & Loren M. Frank, 2016. "A hippocampal network for spatial coding during immobility and sleep," Nature, Nature, vol. 531(7593), pages 185-190, March.
    3. Colin Lever & Tom Wills & Francesca Cacucci & Neil Burgess & John O'Keefe, 2002. "Long-term plasticity in hippocampal place-cell representation of environmental geometry," Nature, Nature, vol. 416(6876), pages 90-94, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pengcheng Zhou & Shawn D Burton & Adam C Snyder & Matthew A Smith & Nathaniel N Urban & Robert E Kass, 2015. "Establishing a Statistical Link between Network Oscillations and Neural Synchrony," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Mojtaba Chehelcheraghi & Cees van Leeuwen & Erik Steur & Chie Nakatani, 2017. "A neural mass model of cross frequency coupling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Dhanya Parameshwaran & Upinder S Bhalla, 2013. "Theta Frequency Background Tunes Transmission but Not Summation of Spiking Responses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Anli A. Liu & Simon Henin & Saman Abbaspoor & Anatol Bragin & Elizabeth A. Buffalo & Jordan S. Farrell & David J. Foster & Loren M. Frank & Tamara Gedankien & Jean Gotman & Jennifer A. Guidera & Kari , 2022. "A consensus statement on detection of hippocampal sharp wave ripples and differentiation from other fast oscillations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Vincent Douchamps & Matteo Volo & Alessandro Torcini & Demian Battaglia & Romain Goutagny, 2024. "Gamma oscillatory complexity conveys behavioral information in hippocampal networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Carina Curto & Vladimir Itskov, 2008. "Cell Groups Reveal Structure of Stimulus Space," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-13, October.
    7. Yanjun Sun & Lisa M. Giocomo, 2022. "Neural circuit dynamics of drug-context associative learning in the mouse hippocampus," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Shinya Ito & Fang-Chin Yeh & Emma Hiolski & Przemyslaw Rydygier & Deborah E Gunning & Pawel Hottowy & Nicholas Timme & Alan M Litke & John M Beggs, 2014. "Large-Scale, High-Resolution Multielectrode-Array Recording Depicts Functional Network Differences of Cortical and Hippocampal Cultures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Caleb Kemere & Margaret F Carr & Mattias P Karlsson & Loren M Frank, 2013. "Rapid and Continuous Modulation of Hippocampal Network State during Exploration of New Places," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.
    10. Bálint Király & Andor Domonkos & Márta Jelitai & Vítor Lopes-dos-Santos & Sergio Martínez-Bellver & Barnabás Kocsis & Dániel Schlingloff & Abhilasha Joshi & Minas Salib & Richárd Fiáth & Péter Barthó , 2023. "The medial septum controls hippocampal supra-theta oscillations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.
    11. Viktor Müller & Ulman Lindenberger, 2014. "Hyper-Brain Networks Support Romantic Kissing in Humans," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Marije ter Wal & Juan Linde-Domingo & Julia Lifanov & Frédéric Roux & Luca D. Kolibius & Stephanie Gollwitzer & Johannes Lang & Hajo Hamer & David Rollings & Vijay Sawlani & Ramesh Chelvarajah & Bernh, 2021. "Theta rhythmicity governs human behavior and hippocampal signals during memory-dependent tasks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Natalia Grion & Athena Akrami & Yangfang Zuo & Federico Stella & Mathew E Diamond, 2016. "Coherence between Rat Sensorimotor System and Hippocampus Is Enhanced during Tactile Discrimination," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:2003354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.