IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/2002556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crowd vocal learning induces vocal dialects in bats: Playback of conspecifics shapes fundamental frequency usage by pups

Author

Listed:
  • Yosef Prat
  • Lindsay Azoulay
  • Roi Dor
  • Yossi Yovel

Abstract

Vocal learning, the substrate of human language acquisition, has rarely been described in other mammals. Often, group-specific vocal dialects in wild populations provide the main evidence for vocal learning. While social learning is often the most plausible explanation for these intergroup differences, it is usually impossible to exclude other driving factors, such as genetic or ecological backgrounds. Here, we show the formation of dialects through social vocal learning in fruit bats under controlled conditions. We raised 3 groups of pups in conditions mimicking their natural roosts. Namely, pups could hear their mothers' vocalizations but were also exposed to a manipulation playback. The vocalizations in the 3 playbacks mainly differed in their fundamental frequency. From the age of approximately 6 months and onwards, the pups demonstrated distinct dialects, where each group was biased towards its playback. We demonstrate the emergence of dialects through social learning in a mammalian model in a tightly controlled environment. Unlike in the extensively studied case of songbirds where specific tutors are imitated, we demonstrate that bats do not only learn their vocalizations directly from their mothers, but that they are actually influenced by the sounds of the entire crowd. This process, which we term “crowd vocal learning,” might be relevant to many other social animals such as cetaceans and pinnipeds.Author summary: The spontaneous acquisition of speech by human infants is considered a keystone of human language, but the ability to reproduce vocalizations acquired by hearing is not commonly described in other mammals. This skill, termed vocal learning, is challenging to study in nonhuman animals since such investigation requires the detection and exclusion of innate developmental effects. The recognition of vocal dialects among different populations can open a window on the vocal learning abilities of animals, but such findings in the wild may reflect genetic or ecological differences between groups rather than the learning of group-specific vocal behavior. In this study, we used a playback-based lab experiment to induce vocal dialects in fruit bat pups. By exposing groups of pups to different playbacks of conspecific calls, we could establish separate dialects, demonstrating the vocal learning skill of these bats. Furthermore, while songbirds, for instance, learn their songs directly from a specific tutor, our bats showed the ability to pick up vocal variations from the surrounding crowd, without direct interaction with any given tutor.

Suggested Citation

  • Yosef Prat & Lindsay Azoulay & Roi Dor & Yossi Yovel, 2017. "Crowd vocal learning induces vocal dialects in bats: Playback of conspecifics shapes fundamental frequency usage by pups," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:2002556
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2002556
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2002556&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yasemin B. Gultekin & Steffen R. Hage, 2017. "Limiting parental feedback disrupts vocal development in marmoset monkeys," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Olga Fehér & Haibin Wang & Sigal Saar & Partha P. Mitra & Ofer Tchernichovski, 2009. "De novo establishment of wild-type song culture in the zebra finch," Nature, Nature, vol. 459(7246), pages 564-568, May.
    3. Michael J. Noad & Douglas H. Cato & M. M. Bryden & Micheline -N. Jenner & K. Curt S. Jenner, 2000. "Cultural revolution in whale songs," Nature, Nature, vol. 408(6812), pages 537-537, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shota Saito & Yoshito Hirata & Kazutoshi Sasahara & Hideyuki Suzuki, 2015. "Tracking Time Evolution of Collective Attention Clusters in Twitter: Time Evolving Nonnegative Matrix Factorisation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Tamura, Kohei & Ihara, Yasuo, 2011. "Classes of communication and the conditions for their evolution," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 79(4), pages 174-183.
    3. Christine Cuskley, 2019. "Alien forms for alien language: investigating novel form spaces in cultural evolution," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Pier Francesco Moretti & Alice Affatati, 2023. "Understanding the Impact of Underwater Noise to Preserve Marine Ecosystems and Manage Anthropogenic Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Lingyun Zhao & Xiaoqin Wang, 2023. "Frontal cortex activity during the production of diverse social communication calls in marmoset monkeys," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Claes Andersson & Claudio Tennie, 2023. "Zooming out the microscope on cumulative cultural evolution: ‘Trajectory B’ from animal to human culture," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. A. Calapai & J. Cabrera-Moreno & T. Moser & M. Jeschke, 2022. "Flexible auditory training, psychophysics, and enrichment of common marmosets with an automated, touchscreen-based system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:2002556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.