IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/1001365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Vestibular System Implements a Linear–Nonlinear Transformation In Order to Encode Self-Motion

Author

Listed:
  • Corentin Massot
  • Adam D Schneider
  • Maurice J Chacron
  • Kathleen E Cullen

Abstract

Early vestibular processing in macaque monkeys is inherently nonlinear and is optimized to detect specific features of self-motion. Although it is well established that the neural code representing the world changes at each stage of a sensory pathway, the transformations that mediate these changes are not well understood. Here we show that self-motion (i.e. vestibular) sensory information encoded by VIIIth nerve afferents is integrated nonlinearly by post-synaptic central vestibular neurons. This response nonlinearity was characterized by a strong (∼50%) attenuation in neuronal sensitivity to low frequency stimuli when presented concurrently with high frequency stimuli. Using computational methods, we further demonstrate that a static boosting nonlinearity in the input-output relationship of central vestibular neurons accounts for this unexpected result. Specifically, when low and high frequency stimuli are presented concurrently, this boosting nonlinearity causes an intensity-dependent bias in the output firing rate, thereby attenuating neuronal sensitivities. We suggest that nonlinear integration of afferent input extends the coding range of central vestibular neurons and enables them to better extract the high frequency features of self-motion when embedded with low frequency motion during natural movements. These findings challenge the traditional notion that the vestibular system uses a linear rate code to transmit information and have important consequences for understanding how the representation of sensory information changes across sensory pathways. Author Summary: Understanding how the coding of sensory information changes at different stages of sensory processing remains a fundamental challenge in systems neuroscience. Here we address this question by studying early sensory processing in vestibular pathways of monkeys, a system for which sensory stimuli are relatively easy to describe. Peripheral vestibular afferents detect and encode head motion in space to ensure posture and gaze is accurate and stable during everyday life. In this study, we show that central vestibular neurons nonlinearly integrate their afferent inputs, which helps explain the mechanisms that generate enhanced feature detection in sensory pathways. In addition, our results overturn conventional wisdom that early vestibular processing is linear, revealing a striking boosting nonlinearity that is a hallmark of the first central stage of vestibular processing. Studies from other sensory systems have shown that higher-order neurons can more efficiently detect specific features of sensory input, and that nonlinear transformations can increase this efficiency. We suggest that nonlinear integration of afferent input by central vestibular neurons extends their coding range and facilitates the detection of natural vestibular stimuli.

Suggested Citation

  • Corentin Massot & Adam D Schneider & Maurice J Chacron & Kathleen E Cullen, 2012. "The Vestibular System Implements a Linear–Nonlinear Transformation In Order to Encode Self-Motion," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1001365
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001365
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001365&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrienne L. Fairhall & Geoffrey D. Lewen & William Bialek & Robert R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, 2001. "Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code," Nature, Nature, vol. 412(6849), pages 787-792, August.
    2. Tomáš Hromádka & Michael R DeWeese & Anthony M Zador, 2008. "Sparse Representation of Sounds in the Unanesthetized Auditory Cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Jaime de la Rocha & Brent Doiron & Eric Shea-Brown & Krešimir Josić & Alex Reyes, 2007. "Correlation between neural spike trains increases with firing rate," Nature, Nature, vol. 448(7155), pages 802-806, August.
    4. Jason S. Rothman & Laurence Cathala & Volker Steuber & R. Angus Silver, 2009. "Synaptic depression enables neuronal gain control," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7232), pages 1015-1018, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Anne-Marie M Oswald & Nathaniel N Urban & Brent Doiron, 2011. "Balanced Synaptic Input Shapes the Correlation between Neural Spike Trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Jonathan Rubin & Nachum Ulanovsky & Israel Nelken & Naftali Tishby, 2016. "The Representation of Prediction Error in Auditory Cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Noga Mosheiff & Haggai Agmon & Avraham Moriel & Yoram Burak, 2017. "An efficient coding theory for a dynamic trajectory predicts non-uniform allocation of entorhinal grid cells to modules," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Joshua H Goldwyn & Bradley R Slabe & Joseph B Travers & David Terman, 2018. "Gain control with A-type potassium current: IA as a switch between divisive and subtractive inhibition," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Gaëlle Desbordes & Jianzhong Jin & Chong Weng & Nicholas A Lesica & Garrett B Stanley & Jose-Manuel Alonso, 2008. "Timing Precision in Population Coding of Natural Scenes in the Early Visual System," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Michael A Carlin & Mounya Elhilali, 2013. "Sustained Firing of Model Central Auditory Neurons Yields a Discriminative Spectro-temporal Representation for Natural Sounds," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Richard Naud & Wulfram Gerstner, 2012. "Coding and Decoding with Adapting Neurons: A Population Approach to the Peri-Stimulus Time Histogram," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Emiliano Torre & Carlos Canova & Michael Denker & George Gerstein & Moritz Helias & Sonja Grün, 2016. "ASSET: Analysis of Sequences of Synchronous Events in Massively Parallel Spike Trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-34, July.
    9. Volker Pernice & Benjamin Staude & Stefano Cardanobile & Stefan Rotter, 2011. "How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-14, May.
    10. Braden A W Brinkman & Alison I Weber & Fred Rieke & Eric Shea-Brown, 2016. "How Do Efficient Coding Strategies Depend on Origins of Noise in Neural Circuits?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-34, October.
    11. Martinez-Saito, Mario, 2022. "Discrete scaling and criticality in a chain of adaptive excitable integrators," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    12. Robert Loshkarev & Dmitry Postnov, 2021. "Toward Minimalistic Model of Cellular Volume Dynamics in Neurovascular Unit," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-13, September.
    13. Francesco Negro & Dario Farina, 2012. "Factors Influencing the Estimates of Correlation between Motor Unit Activities in Humans," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-14, September.
    14. J. Gerard Wolff, 2019. "Information Compression as a Unifying Principle in Human Learning, Perception, and Cognition," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-38, February.
    15. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Brent Doiron, 2015. "Self-Organization of Microcircuits in Networks of Spiking Neurons with Plastic Synapses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-40, August.
    16. A. Barri & M. T. Wiechert & M. Jazayeri & D. A. DiGregorio, 2022. "Synaptic basis of a sub-second representation of time in a neural circuit model," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Krešimir Josić & Eric Shea-Brown & Michael A Buice, 2017. "Linking structure and activity in nonlinear spiking networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-47, June.
    18. Robert Rosenbaum & Jonathan Rubin & Brent Doiron, 2012. "Short Term Synaptic Depression Imposes a Frequency Dependent Filter on Synaptic Information Transfer," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Yifan Gu & Yang Qi & Pulin Gong, 2019. "Rich-club connectivity, diverse population coupling, and dynamical activity patterns emerging from local cortical circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-34, April.
    20. Skander Mensi & Olivier Hagens & Wulfram Gerstner & Christian Pozzorini, 2016. "Enhanced Sensitivity to Rapid Input Fluctuations by Nonlinear Threshold Dynamics in Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-38, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:1001365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.