Fiscal Decentralization And Issues Of Municipal Bonds. The Case Of Romania
Local governments can make an important contribution to public well-being through the execution of local government policies and the delivery of public services that are important to the local citizens. For this reason, through the local budgets are financed the public goods that are selected to be more important. But if the own revenues of the local budgets are low, the local authorities are dependent on the central ones, fact that affect the allocation of resources by the destinations. Because of the unlimited needs, the local governments search for alternative sources of financing, like bank loans, loans from the capital market, leasing, using some collaboration formulas with the private sector, like public-private partnerships and other financing forms. In a analysis on Romanian case, we shows that a greater level of decentralization give to local governments greater possibilities to cover local needs by attracting new resources, also from alternative ways.
Volume (Year): 1 (2010)
Issue (Month): 1 (May)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.pjms.zim.pcz.pl/edi/|
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Tatiana Mosteanu & Carmen Maria Lacatus, 2008. "The Municipal Bonds – the Cause and the Effect of the Local Financial Decentralisation Growth. Romanian Case," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 9(9(526)), pages 51-60, September.
- Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Cristian Sepúlveda & Gabriel Leonardo & Benjamin Miller, 2006. "Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in Romania: Challenges and Options for Reform," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0619, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pcz:journl:v:1:y:2010:i:1:p:70-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Paula Bajdor)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.