IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v64y2013i9p1374-1383.html

Enhanced decision support in credit scoring using Bayesian binary quantile regression

Author

Listed:
  • V L Miguéis

    (University of Porto, Porto, Portugal)

  • D F Benoit

    (Ghent University, Gent, Belgium)

  • D Van den Poel

    (Ghent University, Gent, Belgium)

Abstract

Fierce competition as well as the recent financial crisis in financial and banking industries made credit scoring gain importance. An accurate estimation of credit risk helps organizations to decide whether or not to grant credit to potential customers. Many classification methods have been suggested to handle this problem in the literature. This paper proposes a model for evaluating credit risk based on binary quantile regression, using Bayesian estimation. This paper points out the distinct advantages of the latter approach: that is (i) the method provides accurate predictions of which customers may default in the future, (ii) the approach provides detailed insight into the effects of the explanatory variables on the probability of default, and (iii) the methodology is ideally suited to build a segmentation scheme of the customers in terms of risk of default and the corresponding uncertainty about the prediction. An often studied dataset from a German bank is used to show the applicability of the method proposed. The results demonstrate that the methodology can be an important tool for credit companies that want to take the credit risk of their customer fully into account.

Suggested Citation

  • V L Miguéis & D F Benoit & D Van den Poel, 2013. "Enhanced decision support in credit scoring using Bayesian binary quantile regression," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(9), pages 1374-1383, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:64:y:2013:i:9:p:1374-1383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v64/n9/pdf/jors2012116a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v64/n9/full/jors2012116a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benoit, Dries F. & Van den Poel, Dirk, 2017. "bayesQR: A Bayesian Approach to Quantile Regression," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 76(i07).
    2. Tu, Jiancheng & Wu, Zhibin, 2025. "Inherently interpretable machine learning for credit scoring: Optimal classification tree with hyperplane splits," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(2), pages 647-664.
    3. Li, Yibei & Wang, Ximei & Djehiche, Boualem & Hu, Xiaoming, 2020. "Credit scoring by incorporating dynamic networked information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1103-1112.
    4. Runchi Zhang & Iris Li & Zhiyuan Ding & Tianhao Zhu, 2025. "IWSL Model: A Novel Credit Scoring Model With Interpretable Features for Consumer Credit Scenarios," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(7), pages 2230-2251, November.
    5. Vera L. Miguéis & Ana S. Camanho & José Borges, 2017. "Predicting direct marketing response in banking: comparison of class imbalance methods," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(4), pages 831-849, December.
    6. Stéphane Goutte & Konstantinos N. Konstantakis & Dimitris Konstantios & Panayotis G. Michaelides & Arsenios‐Georgios N. Prelorentzos, 2026. "Econometrics at the Extreme: From Quantile Regression to QFAVAR1," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 1672-1686, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:64:y:2013:i:9:p:1374-1383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.