A Critical Analysis of the Solvency II Proposals
The European Commission has recently published the Solvency II proposals with the objective to fundamentally review the insurance supervisory framework. We test the Solvency II framework against seven criteria developed by Cummins et al. describing how best to duplicate the operation of an efficient and complete market. We conclude that Solvency II satisfies most of these criteria. We recommend a more balanced framework between Pillar I and II/III. In this way, Pillar II/III will resolve some of the problems in Pillar I, such as inappropriate incentives of the capital requirements formulae (hard solvency capital requirement limit, modular minimum capital requirement). Areas for further work on Pillars II and III are operational and business risk, long-term effects of strategic decision-making. The Geneva Papers (2008) 33, 193–206. doi:10.1057/gpp.2008.2
Volume (Year): 33 (2008)
Issue (Month): 2 (April)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/|
Postal:Route de Malagnou 53, CH - 1208 Geneva
Phone: +41-22 707 66 00
Fax: +41-22 736 75 36
Web page: https://www.genevaassociation.org/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.springer.com/finance/journal/41288/PS2|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:33:y:2008:i:2:p:193-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)or (Rebekah McClure)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.