Optimal insurance contracts without the non-negativity constraint on indemnities: revisited
In the literature on optimal indemnity schedules, indemnities are usually restricted to be non-negative. Keeler  and Gollier  show that this constraint might well bind: insured could get higher expected utility if insurance contracts would allow payments from the insured to the insurer at some losses. This paper extends Collier's findings by allowing for negative indemnity payments for a broader class of insurers' cost functions and argues that the indemnity schedule derived here is more appropriate for practical applications (e.g. in health insurance). The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review (2006) 31, 5–9. doi:10.1007/s10713-006-9463-0
Volume (Year): 31 (2006)
Issue (Month): 1 (July)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/|
|Order Information:|| Postal: Palgrave Macmillan Journals, Subscription Department, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS, UK|
Web: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/pal/subscribe/index.html Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:genrir:v:31:y:2006:i:1:p:5-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Daniel Foley)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.