IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/eurjdr/v22y2010i4p546-563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Happiness Affect the Bilateral Aid Flows Between Donor and Recipient Countries?

Author

Listed:
  • B Mak Arvin

    (Department of Economics, Trent University, Ontario, Canada)

  • Byron Lew

    (Department of Economics, Trent University, Ontario, Canada)

Abstract

The literature on the economics of well-being and happiness is currently growing at a remarkable rate. In separate studies, happiness has been linked to income, health, age, political and economic freedom, unemployment, inflation, self-employment, voluntary work, marriage, and even watching television. None of these studies have linked happiness to foreign aid disbursements. Using data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the World Bank and the World Database of Happiness, we construct an empirical model of aid, in which a host of donor interest and recipient need motives impact on the level of assistance a donor country gives. However, unlike other studies of aid, we concentrate on three factors in donor aid disbursement: the degree of happiness of the donor and the recipient; geographical proximity between the two countries; and competition between donors in providing aid. Using a number of different specifications, we test, in particular, the validity of the hypothesis that donor and recipient happiness are important determinants of levels of aid.La littérature sur l’économie du bien-être s’accroît à une vitesse remarquable. Différentes études ont montré le lien entre le bonheur et les revenus, la santé, l’âge, la liberté économique et politique, le chômage, l’inflation, le travail indépendant, le bénévolat, le mariage et même l’acte de regarder la télévision. Aucune de ces études n’a fait le lien entre le bonheur et les dépenses d’aides à l’étranger. À partir de données provenant de l’OCDE, de la Banque Mondiale et de la Base de Données Mondiales sur le Bonheur, nous développons un modèle empirique d’aide dans lequel un grand nombre de motivations relatives aux intérêts des pays donateurs et aux besoins des pays receveurs ont un impact sur le niveau d’aide fournie par le pays donateur. Cependant, contrairement à d’autres études sur l’aide, nous nous concentrons sur trois facteurs influençant les dépenses d’aide réalisées par les pays donateurs: le degré de bonheur du pays donateur et du pays bénéficiaire, la proximité géographique des deux pays, la concurrence à laquelle se livrent les donateurs pour fournir l’aide. En mobilisant un ensemble de spécifications, nous testons notamment la validité de l’hypothèse selon laquelle le bonheur du pays donateur et celui du bénéficiaire sont d’importants déterminants du niveau d’aide.

Suggested Citation

  • B Mak Arvin & Byron Lew, 2010. "Does Happiness Affect the Bilateral Aid Flows Between Donor and Recipient Countries?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 22(4), pages 546-563, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:22:y:2010:i:4:p:546-563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v22/n4/pdf/ejdr201028a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ejdr/journal/v22/n4/full/ejdr201028a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simplice A. Asongu & Jacinta C. Nwachukwu, 2016. "Is the Threat of Foreign Aid Withdrawal an Effective Deterrent to Political Oppression? Evidence from 53 African Countries," Research Africa Network Working Papers 16/020, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    2. Simplice Asongu, 2016. "Reinventing Foreign Aid For Inclusive And Sustainable Development: Kuznets, Piketty And The Great Policy Reversal," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 736-755, September.
    3. Asongu, Simplice, 2014. "A brief clarification to the questionable economics of foreign aid for inclusive human development," MPRA Paper 64458, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Simplice A. Asongu, 2014. "Reinventing foreign aid for inclusive and sustainable development: a survey," Research Africa Network Working Papers 14/033, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    5. Simplice A. Asongu & Joseph I. Uduji & Elda N. Okolo-Obasi, 2020. "Foreign aid volatility and lifelong learning," International Journal of Education Economics and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(4), pages 370-406.
    6. Simplice A. Asongu & Jacinta C. Nwachukwu, 2017. "Not all that glitters is gold: ICT and inclusive human development in Sub-Saharan Africa," International Journal of Happiness and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 303-322.
    7. Iliana Olivié & Aitor Pérez, 2016. "Why don’t donor countries coordinate their aid? A case study of European donors in Morocco," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 16(1), pages 52-64, January.
    8. Asongu Simplice, 2014. "The Evolving Debate on the Effect of Foreign Aid on Corruption and Institutions in Africa," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 14/009, African Governance and Development Institute..
    9. Beletskaya, M., 2019. "Bilateral International Assistance: Factors for Donor Countries," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 43(3), pages 95-114.
    10. Parviz Dabir-Alai & Abbas Valadkhani, 2016. "Foreign aid, economic outcomes, and happiness," International Journal of Happiness and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 97-107.
    11. Renz, Timon, 2021. "Development policy based on happiness? A review of concepts, ideas and pitfalls," FZG Discussion Papers 75, University of Freiburg, Research Center for Generational Contracts (FZG).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:eurjdr:v:22:y:2010:i:4:p:546-563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.