IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time to Pick a Fight? Interest Group Decision Making to Enter the Hydropower Regulatory Process


  • Lea Kosnik

    () (Department of Economics, University of Missouri — St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63121-4499, USA.)


Assuming that interest groups, like households, firms, or any other structured organization, have limited resources but broad objectives, how do they pick and choose which regulatory battles to fight? The issue of interest group battle choice has received little direct attention in the literature, in large part because defining the state space of total interest group activity is often difficult to do in practice. This paper is able to overcome such a difficulty by drawing on a unique data set regarding the hydroelectric dam relicensing process in the United States. In this context, there is evidence that what is most consistently significant in affecting the battle entry decision across the interest groups under study is strategic considerations — how many allies are expected to also get involved in a particular fight and, even more importantly, who the enemy is that you will be up against.

Suggested Citation

  • Lea Kosnik, 2010. "Time to Pick a Fight? Interest Group Decision Making to Enter the Hydropower Regulatory Process," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 11-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:easeco:v:36:y:2010:i:1:p:11-32

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL:
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Amy McKay, 2011. "The decision to lobby bureaucrats," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 123-138, April.
    2. Vogel, Sarah K. & Jansujwicz, Jessica S. & Sponarski, Carly C. & Zydlewski, Joseph D., 2020. "Science in action or science inaction? Evaluating the implementation of "best available science” in hydropower relicensing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:easeco:v:36:y:2010:i:1:p:11-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.