Labour Market Effects of Defined Contribution Plans: An International Survey
Because of the apparent simplicity of defined contribution plans, they have until recently received relatively little analysis by economists. The presumption that defined contribution plans are non-distortionary is stronger for voluntary than mandatory plans because with voluntary plans workers have the choice to not work for employers that offer them. This article argues that mandatory defined contribution plans may be structured in ways that cause them to affect worker and employer behaviour by affecting aspects of labour supply and demand. For example, any mandatory program that attempts to increase workers' retirement savings may change their labour supply behaviour, both because individuals act to minimise the consequences of the program and because of the effects of the workers' greater retirement savings, if the program succeeds in that regard.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 4 (2000-2001)
Issue (Month): 3 (September)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://business.curtin.edu.au/research/publications/journals/ajle/|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:4:y:2001:i:3:p:224-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alan Duncan)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.