IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v51y2024i6p1185-1190..html

Techno-nationalism to collaborative technology sovereignty

Author

Listed:
  • Jeong-Dong Lee
  • Hanbin Kim
  • Saerom Si
  • Saangkeub Lee

Abstract

The current geopolitical instability has driven global policy frameworks to prioritize economic security. This shift has intensified the debate on technology sovereignty among developed countries, due to concerns over supply chain disruptions and competition for future technologies. However, equating technology sovereignty with techno-nationalism should be avoided. Techno-nationalism can lead to unrealistic goals of domestically possessing all necessary technologies, resulting in protectionism. Given the complex and interconnected nature of technological development, no single country can control all component technologies. This study proposes a concept of collaborative technology sovereignty, promoting openness in technology development and acquisition. Policies should focus on creating systems for sharing technologies with like-minded countries while securing critical technologies. Lessons from existing policies are essential for expanding this collaborative approach and establishing strategies for collaborative technology sovereignty.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeong-Dong Lee & Hanbin Kim & Saerom Si & Saangkeub Lee, 2024. "Techno-nationalism to collaborative technology sovereignty," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 51(6), pages 1185-1190.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:6:p:1185-1190.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scae046
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Blind, Knut, 2025. "Standardization and Standards: Safeguards of Technological Sovereignty?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    2. Kivimaa, Paula & Janssen, Matthijs & Edler, Jakob, 2026. "From sustainability transitions to security: Mapping the new terrain for innovation policy," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 92, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    3. Francesco Crespi & Nicolò Geri & Dario Guarascio & Enrico Marvasi, 2026. "Can strategicdependenciesharmthe acceleration towardsnet-zerotransition? The caseofthelithium-ionbattery industry," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0291, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    4. Gryglewicz, Kim & Childs, Kristina K. & Soderstrom, Melanie F.P. & Elligson, Richard L. & Lockwood, Ashley, 2025. "Youth mental health first aid training outcomes among public safety professionals serving high-risk youth," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Francesco Crespi & Nicolò Geri & Dario Guarascio & Enrico Marvasi, 2026. "Can strategic dependencies harm the acceleration towards net-zero transition? The case of the lithium-ion battery industry," Working Papers in Public Economics 276, Department of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Rome.
    6. Crespi Francesco & Cerra Rosario & Zezza Francesco, 2025. "Coopetitive Technological Sovereignty: A Strategy to Reconcile International Collaboration with Knowledge and Economic Security," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Sciendo, vol. 60(2), pages 73-80.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:51:y:2024:i:6:p:1185-1190.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.