IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v49y2022i5p801-805..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspective on research–policy interface as a partnership: The study of best practices in CREATE
[Bridging the Research-Practice Gap]

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Banozic-Tang
  • Araz Taeihagh

Abstract

This article serves as a blueprint and proof-of-concept of Singapore’s Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programmes in establishing effective collaborations with governmental partners. CREATE is a research consortium between Singapore’s public universities and international research institutions. The effective partnership of CREATE partners with government stakeholders is part of its mission to help government agencies solve complex issues in areas that reflect Singapore’s national interest. Projects are developed in consultation with stakeholders, and challenges are addressed on a scale that enables significant impact and provides solutions for Singapore and internationally. The article discusses the lessons learnt, highlighting that while research–policy partnerships are widespread, they are seldom documented. Moreover, effective communication proved to be a foundation for an effective partnership where policy and research partners were more likely to provide formal and informal feedback. Engaging policy partners early in the research co-development process was beneficial in establishing effective partnerships.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana Banozic-Tang & Araz Taeihagh, 2022. "Perspective on research–policy interface as a partnership: The study of best practices in CREATE [Bridging the Research-Practice Gap]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(5), pages 801-805.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:5:p:801-805.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scac028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helena Leino & Minna Santaoja & Markus Laine, 2018. "Researchers as knowledge brokers: translating knowledge or co-producing legitimacy? An urban infill case from Finland," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 119-129, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helena Leino & Eeva Puumala, 2021. "What can co-creation do for the citizens? Applying co-creation for the promotion of participation in cities," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(4), pages 781-799, June.
    2. Helka Kalliomäki & Sampo Ruoppila & Jenni Airaksinen, 2021. "It takes two to tango: Examining productive interactions in urban research collaboration [Generating Research Questions through Problematization]," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(4), pages 529-539.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:49:y:2022:i:5:p:801-805.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.