IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v46y2019i5p635-647..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to evaluate innovation strategies with a transformative ambition? A proposal for a structured, process-based approach

Author

Listed:
  • Henning Kroll

Abstract

In recent years, policymakers have increased their ambitions to shape the development of national and regional innovation systems. More often than was, innovation strategies now come with the ambition to support economic transformation and societal change in a way that requires the rearrangement of existing policy mixes. With a view to policy assessment, these developments raise new, so far untackled challenges. Against this background, this article illustrates that standard approaches to programme evaluation must be unfit to assess overarching strategies. It finds that this is not only a function of their complexity but also of the open-ended nature of processes required to translate strategic ambitions into concrete actions. To better grasp those, it puts forward a novel heuristic to structure our understanding of the discursive process preceding the definition of tangible policy measures at three levels: strategy agenda setting, thematic orientation, and instrumentation. Subsequently, it demonstrates how this approach helps localize and clarify instances of failure for later assessment. Based on a detailed case study, it underlines that efforts to ensure the consequential translation of ambitions into corresponding measures will lead to better results than the futile attempt to keep the resulting policy mixes free of any formal inconsistencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Henning Kroll, 2019. "How to evaluate innovation strategies with a transformative ambition? A proposal for a structured, process-based approach," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(5), pages 635-647.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:46:y:2019:i:5:p:635-647.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scz016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Harald Rohracher & Lars Coenen & Olga Kordas, 2023. "Mission incomplete: Layered practices of monitoring and evaluation in Swedish transformative innovation policy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(2), pages 336-349.
    2. Haddad, Carolina R. & Bergek, Anna, 2023. "Towards an integrated framework for evaluating transformative innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    3. Matthijs J Janssen & Joeri Wesseling & Jonas Torrens & K Matthias & Caetano Penna & Laurens Klerkx, 2023. "Missions as boundary objects for transformative change: understanding coordination across policy, research, and stakeholder communities," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(3), pages 398-415.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:46:y:2019:i:5:p:635-647.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.