IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v42y2015i4p583-593..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cross-national environmental cluster collaboration: Shifting between an analytical and management level of the triple helix

Author

Listed:
  • Joacim Rosenlund
  • William Hogland
  • Anders W. Johansson
  • Jackie Seddon

Abstract

The STInno project, which was part of the EU Framework Programme 7 aimed to minimise the distance between south–north regions in Europe with a specific focus on wastewater treatment clusters. Three triple helix collaborations from three different countries participated, using their knowledge to work on a case study of olive mill wastewaters. The objective of this paper was to study how the triple helix functioned in practice. Results showed that a management model of the triple helix is somewhat different from the analytical model. A shift between these two views occurred during the project and the participants had to relate to this, as it had an effect on the outcomes. Concepts of social capital and trust are used to further elaborate on this by emphasising the importance of the people side of the triple helix and how the original, analytical model can be limiting when used in management practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Joacim Rosenlund & William Hogland & Anders W. Johansson & Jackie Seddon, 2015. "A cross-national environmental cluster collaboration: Shifting between an analytical and management level of the triple helix," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(4), pages 583-593.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:42:y:2015:i:4:p:583-593.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/scipol/scu075
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hugo Pinto & Tiago Santos Pereira, 2013. "Efficiency of Innovation Systems in Europe: An Institutional Approach to the Diversity of National Profiles," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 755-779, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fotis Kitsios & Maria Kamariotou & Evangelos Grigoroudis, 2021. "Digital Entrepreneurship Services Evolution: Analysis of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Models for Open Data Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyet Thi Minh Nguyen & Chau Minh Duong, 2019. "What Make the Impact of the Financial Crisis on Innovation Different Across European Countries?," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-29, October.
    2. Terk, Eric, 2014. "Practicing catching-up: A comparison of development models of East Asian and Central-Eastern European countries," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2014-02, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    3. Ibrahim Alnafrah & Sulaiman Mouselli, 2020. "The Role of National Innovation Systems in Entrepreneurship Activities at Baltic State Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(1), pages 84-102, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:42:y:2015:i:4:p:583-593.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.