IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v29y2002i4p287-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural public-sector research establishments in Western Europe: Research priorities in conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Villy Søgaard

Abstract

Two conflicting pressures face agriculture-related PSREs (public-sector research establishments) in Western Europe. Governments expect them to contribute to national economic performance and build links with industry, thus assisting particularly the major private-sector innovation trajectory involving biotechnology. PSREs are also expected to use their knowledge and expertise in the public interest, in at least two ways: by developing new techniques and products that have public benefits but are unlikely to be commercially attractive; and by being a public ‘watchdog’, for instance, by assessing possible environmental risks from agricultural inputs and practices. Increased private-sector involvement poses problems for their public-service role. The case studies reported here cast doubt on suggestions that knowledge production becomes more socially accountable as research priorities address real-world practical problems. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Villy Søgaard, 2002. "Agricultural public-sector research establishments in Western Europe: Research priorities in conflict," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 29(4), pages 287-295, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:29:y:2002:i:4:p:287-295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154302781780912
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2008. "Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 260-276, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:29:y:2002:i:4:p:287-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.