IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/scippl/v27y2000i6p421-431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convergence and differentiation in institutional change among European public research systems: the decreasing role of public research institutes

Author

Listed:
  • Bianca Potì
  • Emanuela Reale

Abstract

In the 1990s two main political objectives have become evident in European public research systems (PRS): a more flexible use of available resources; and strong government action to enhance collaborative networks between the public sector and the users of research results. There are similarities in problem identification from one country to another but problem-solving strategies differ. This paper offers a comparative analysis of this phenomenon for four European countries — France, the UK, Spain and Italy — seeking to ‘operationalise’ convergence and differentiation in trends towards flexibility and collaboration among PRSs. The data used are from the OECD statistics and national country reports that formed part of the European PSR Project. A brief discussion is developed about the dangers arising from the use of flexibility. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianca Potì & Emanuela Reale, 2000. "Convergence and differentiation in institutional change among European public research systems: the decreasing role of public research institutes," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(6), pages 421-431, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:27:y:2000:i:6:p:421-431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154300781781751
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Hyeonchae & Jung, Woo-Sung, 2016. "Structural efficiency to manipulate public research institution networks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 21-32.
    2. Bianca Potì & Emanuela Reale, 2007. "Government R&D funding: new approaches in the allocation policies for public and private beneficiaries," CERIS Working Paper 200709, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.
    3. Philippe Mustar & Mike Wright, 2010. "Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 42-65, February.
    4. E.V. Dmitrishina & D.A. Uskov, 2015. "The Issues of Covering Science and Technical Policy of Modern Russia in the Strategic Planning Documents," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 57-74.
    5. Mosoniné Fried, Judit & Szunyogh, Zsuzsanna, 2008. "Kutatás és fejlesztés a közszférában [Research and development in the public sphere]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 60-79.
    6. Stanislav Zaichenko, 2018. "The human resource dimension of science-based technology transfer: lessons from Russian RTOs and innovative enterprises," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 368-388, April.
    7. Young-Sun Jang & Young Joo Ko, 2019. "How latecomers catch up to leaders in high-energy physics as Big Science: transition from national system to international collaboration," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 437-480, April.
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5019 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:scippl:v:27:y:2000:i:6:p:421-431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/spp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.