IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v9y2000i2p115-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International trends in evaluating university research outcomes: what lessons for Australia?

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Garrett-Jones

Abstract

An international study compared methods used to monitor and evaluate the outcomes of university research in the United States, Canada, the Netherlands and elsewhere. It aimed to provide a foundation for improving the evaluation of research and research training in Australian universities. Evaluation methods were considered in terms of their audience, the type of outputs, outcomes or impacts being measured, and the types of research funding support schemes to which they were applied. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Garrett-Jones, 2000. "International trends in evaluating university research outcomes: what lessons for Australia?," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 115-124, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:9:y:2000:i:2:p:115-124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154400781777278
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dusan Lesjak, 2019. "Measuring Impacts of Science and Research on the Society: Development, Issues and Solutions," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 14(3), pages 219-236.
    2. Lima, Giovanna de Moura Rocha & Wood Júnior, Thomaz, 2014. "O impacto social da pesquisa em administração de empresas e da administração pública," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 54(4), July.
    3. Tucker, Basil P. & Tilt, Carol A., 2019. "‘You know it when you see it’: In search of ‘the ideal’ research culture in university accounting faculties," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Power, Michael, 2015. "How accounting begins: Object formation and the accretion of infrastructure," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 43-55.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:9:y:2000:i:2:p:115-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.