IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v5y1995i1p69-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

R&D evaluation in Italy: a science and technology policy view

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Silvani
  • Giorgio Sirilli

Abstract

The situation in Italy with regard to evaluation is unsatisfactory: the limited experience in carrying out evaluation, the inherent risks of its improper use, and the difficulty of reporting results in the presence of unclear objectives represent the major obstacles. However, progress on the adoption of evaluation procedures has come in recent years. In this paper the major evaluation studies are reviewed in the context of Italian science and technology policy. It is argued that the limited diffusion of evaluation in Italy is linked to cultural, organisational and institutional factors. The increasing demand by the public for accountability, and the growing internationalisation of R&D, accelerated by European integration, is expected to contribute to the spreading of evaluation processes in the country. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Silvani & Giorgio Sirilli, 1995. "R&D evaluation in Italy: a science and technology policy view," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 69-77, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:5:y:1995:i:1:p:69-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rev/5.1.69
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daraio, Cinzia & Moed, Henk F., 2011. "Is Italian science declining?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 1380-1392.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:5:y:1995:i:1:p:69-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.