IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rseval/v11y2002i2p65-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Research assessment: what's next?’ final report on a workshop

Author

Listed:
  • Susan E Cozzens

Abstract

The group successfully articulated the focus of an area of social inquiry concerned with understanding the functioning of innovation systems, including how resources can be organized for technological advance and social and economic growth. Indicators, performance measurement and evaluation practice all grow out of this larger body of study. The area thus promises to form a critical nexus between innovation theory and science policy. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan E Cozzens, 2002. "‘Research assessment: what's next?’ final report on a workshop," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 65-79, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:11:y:2002:i:2:p:65-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3152/147154402781776925
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiménez-Sáez, Fernando & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel & Zofío, José L. & Castro-Martínez, Elena, 2011. "Evaluating research efficiency within National R&D Programmes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 230-241, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rseval:v:11:y:2002:i:2:p:65-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/rev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.