IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v73y2021i3p1244-1269..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elasticities of taxable income and adjustment costs: bunching evidence from New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Nazila Alinaghi
  • John Creedy
  • Norman Gemmell

Abstract

This article obtains elasticity of taxable income (ETI) estimates using data for NZ over the period, 2001–2017, and using the connection between the ETI and excess bunching at income tax thresholds. Results are reported for the top two thresholds in the tax schedule and for various taxpayer types. Adjustments to tax changes are investigated by comparing ETIs obtained from persistent bunching at thresholds when the tax regime is unchanged, with transitory values associated with specific tax reforms. Results suggest substantial bunching around both tax kinks, with ETIs of around 0.2–0.3 across all taxpayers. Evidence suggests large responses by the self-employed, with ETIs of around 0.8–1.0. No significant differences between males and females were found. Adjustment costs and/or inattention biases associated with a shift in a tax threshold were equivalent initially to around 18% (declining to 6%) of the observed excess mass at the post-reform threshold.

Suggested Citation

  • Nazila Alinaghi & John Creedy & Norman Gemmell, 2021. "Elasticities of taxable income and adjustment costs: bunching evidence from New Zealand," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 73(3), pages 1244-1269.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:73:y:2021:i:3:p:1244-1269.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oep/gpaa046
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lynn Riggs & Dean Hyslop & David Maré, 2022. "Estimating the impact of the Families Package changes in financial incentives," Working Papers 22_06, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    2. Nazila Alinaghi & John Creedy & Norman Gemmell, 2023. "Do couples bunch more? Evidence from partnered and single taxpayers," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(4), pages 1137-1184, August.
    3. Philippe Aghion & Ufuk Akcigit & Maxime Gravoueille & Matthieu Lequien & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2023. "Tax simplicity or simplicity of evasion? Evidence from self-employment taxes in France," POID Working Papers 050, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • D04 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Policy: Formulation; Implementation; Evaluation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:73:y:2021:i:3:p:1244-1269.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.