Academic and industrial R&D: are they always complementary? A theoretical approach
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Cozzi, Guido & Galli, Silvia, 2017.
"Should the government protect its basic research?,"
Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 122-124.
- Cozzi, Guido & Galli, Silvia, 2017. "Should the Government Protect its Basic Research?," MPRA Paper 79622, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Cozzi, Guido & Galli, Silvia, 2021.
"Privatization of knowledge: Did the U.S. get it right?,"
Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 179-191.
- Guido Cozzi & Silvia Galli, "undated". "Privatization of Knowledge: Did the U.S. Get It Right?," Working Papers 2008_01, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
- Cozzi, Guido & Galli, Silvia, 2013. "Privatization of Knowledge: Did the U.S. Get It Right?," Economics Working Paper Series 1307, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
- Daniele Tavani & Luca Zamparelli, 2020.
"Growth, income distribution, and the ‘entrepreneurial state’,"
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 117-141, January.
- Daniele Tavani & Luca Zamparelli, 2017. "Growth, Income Distribution, and the ‘Entrepreneurial State’," Working Papers 1711, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
- Daniele Tavani & Luca Zamparelli, 2016. "Distributive Conflict, Growth, and the ‘Entrepreneurial State’," Working Papers 6/16, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:65:y:2013:i:1:p:147-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.