IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxecpp/v45y1993i2p292-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Determines Institutional Investment? An Examination of UK Pension Funds in the 1980s

Author

Listed:
  • Dinenis, Elias
  • Scott, Andrew

Abstract

U.K. pension funds account for 38 percent of personal sector net financial wealth and are a major investor in U.K. domestic asset markets. This paper analyzes the investment behavior of the U.K. pension fund industry between 1980 and 1988. The authors provide a stable explanation for this behavior and find that pension funds satisfy the requirements of portfolio theory. Their estimates enable them to calculate the responsiveness of asset demands to change in rates of return and wealth, most of which are intuitively plausible. Copyright 1993 by Royal Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Dinenis, Elias & Scott, Andrew, 1993. "What Determines Institutional Investment? An Examination of UK Pension Funds in the 1980s," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(2), pages 292-310, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:45:y:1993:i:2:p:292-310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0030-7653%28199304%292%3A45%3A2%3C292%3AWDIIAE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael A.S. Joyce & Zhuoshi Liu & Ian Tonks, 2017. "Institutional Investors and the QE Portfolio Balance Channel," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(6), pages 1225-1246, September.
    2. Joyce, Michael & Liu, Zhuoshi & Tonks, Ian, 2014. "Institutional investor portfolio allocation, quantitative easing and the global financial crisis," Bank of England working papers 510, Bank of England.
    3. Bonizzi, Bruno, 2017. "Institutional investors’ allocation to emerging markets: A panel approach to asset demand," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 47-64.
    4. Douglas, Graeme & Roberts-Sklar, Matt, 2018. "What drives UK defined benefit pension funds' investment behaviour?," Bank of England working papers 757, Bank of England.
    5. George, Donald A R, 2012. "A two-sector growth model with institutional saving and investment," SIRE Discussion Papers 2012-28, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    6. Blake, David, 2003. "Modelling the composition of personal sector wealth in the United Kingdom," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 24866, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Donald George, 2017. "A Pasinetti model of savings and growth," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 278, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
    8. D. Peter Broer & W. Jos Jansen, 1998. "Dynamic Portfolio Adjustment and Capital Controls: A Euler Equation Approach," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 902-921, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxecpp:v:45:y:1993:i:2:p:292-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.