IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v48y2021i4p541-561..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exposure to Brands Makes Preferential Decisions Easier

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan Rahinel
  • Ashley S Otto
  • Daniel M Grossman
  • Joshua J Clarkson
  • Margaret C Campbell
  • Kevin Lane Keller

Abstract

The most consequential consideration of brands arises during preferential decision-making. This article proposes that as a consequence of the repeated pairing of brands and preferential decisions, exposure to brands initiates a cognitive state of readiness for preferential decisions (which we term decision readiness) that subsequently makes preferential decisions easier. Using both real and fictitious brands across a variety of choice contexts, seven experiments demonstrate that consumers find preferential decision-making easier when it occurs in the presence (vs. absence) of brands. Consistent with the details of our framework, this effect: (i) is explained by the activation of decision readiness, (ii) leads to outcomes such as increased outcome satisfaction and decreased decision delegation, and (iii) is attenuated when exposure is to only one brand. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the importance of exposure to brands for decision-making which, in turn, offers novel insight into existing literatures on brand exposure, decision difficulty, and brand roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan Rahinel & Ashley S Otto & Daniel M Grossman & Joshua J Clarkson & Margaret C Campbell & Kevin Lane Keller, 2021. "Exposure to Brands Makes Preferential Decisions Easier," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(4), pages 541-561.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:541-561.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucab025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:541-561.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.