IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v48y2021i3p415-427..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of a Two-Step Choice Process on Trade-Off Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Lei
  • Ying Zhang
  • Vicki G Morwitz
  • Amna Kirmani
  • Kristin Diehl

Abstract

Trade-offs between attributes are common when making product choices. Prior research suggests that consumers tend to avoid the extremes and opt for the middle options when they make a trade-off decision between two key product attributes (e.g., tastiness and healthiness of food items) in one step. In this research, we examine how consumers make such trade-off decisions in a two-step choice process in which consumers first choose between product categories competing on two key attributes and then make a final choice within the chosen category. In three studies, we show that when holding the actual choice options unchanged, consumers are more likely to make a more extreme final choice, prioritizing a single attribute rather than compromising when they follow a two-step choice process instead of a one-step process.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Lei & Ying Zhang & Vicki G Morwitz & Amna Kirmani & Kristin Diehl, 2021. "The Impact of a Two-Step Choice Process on Trade-Off Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(3), pages 415-427.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:48:y:2021:i:3:p:415-427.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucab016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:48:y:2021:i:3:p:415-427.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.