IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v30y2021i5p1230-1258..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital platforms and the transactions cost approach to competition law
[Digital platforms inquiry: Final report, Technical report, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission]

Author

Listed:
  • Darryl Biggar
  • Alberto Heimler

Abstract

For the past few decades, competition authorities around the world have said they seek to promote consumer welfare. However, in recent years, several national competition authorities have announced major investigations into behavior by digital platforms—including some behavior that does not immediately harm downstream consumers. This has reopened old questions about the fundamental purpose of competition law: What is the harm that competition law is designed to address? How, exactly, does competition law promote economic welfare? Separately, the literature on ecosystems emphasizes the central role of non-generic complementary investments as a defining feature of ecosystems and the power this can give to ecosystem orchestrators over their associated complementors. We draw these strands together to show how a recently proposed economic foundation for competition law, drawing on the transactions cost literature, provides a consistent, compelling, and economically sound foundation for competition policy toward digital platforms going forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Darryl Biggar & Alberto Heimler, 2021. "Digital platforms and the transactions cost approach to competition law [Digital platforms inquiry: Final report, Technical report, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(5), pages 1230-1258.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:30:y:2021:i:5:p:1230-1258.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtab051
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beatriz Kira & Vikram Sinha & Sharmadha Srinivasan, 2021. "Regulating digital ecosystems: bridging the gap between competition policy and data protection [Merger policy in digital markets: an ex post assessment]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(5), pages 1337-1360.
    2. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    3. Leroux, Anke & Söderberg, Magnus, 2023. "Network Regulation under electoral competition," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Biggar, Darryl, 2022. "Seven outstanding issues in energy network regulation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:30:y:2021:i:5:p:1230-1258.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.