IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v25y2016i3p407-427..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Editor's Choice Comparing the productivity impacts of knowledge spillovers from network and arm’s length industries: findings from business groups in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Keun Lee
  • Kineung Choo
  • Minho Yoon

Abstract

Given the increasing significance of knowledge spillovers in innovation, this study investigates and compares knowledge spillovers from arm’s length firms in the industries (market) with those from sister firms in the same business group (network). By dividing the knowledge pool into pools within and outside a sector to which a firm belongs, we reexamine the ongoing debate on the relative size of the intra- versus inter-sector spillovers, and address a new question on the relative size of spillovers from networks compared with that from arm’s length industries. We find that, although both intra- and inter-sector spillovers are significant, no evidence proves the dominance of either type of spillover, whether the spillover is from industries or from networks. More importantly, we find that spillovers from networks are greater than those from industries, regardless of whether the comparison was made between intra- and intra-, inter- and inter-, intra- and inter-, or inter- and intra-sector spillovers. Results imply that knowledge spillover is not automatic, and knowledge can be transferred better through direct interaction, which is more prevalent within network organizations, such as business groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Keun Lee & Kineung Choo & Minho Yoon, 2016. "Editor's Choice Comparing the productivity impacts of knowledge spillovers from network and arm’s length industries: findings from business groups in Korea," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(3), pages 407-427.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:25:y:2016:i:3:p:407-427.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtv036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Biancini, Sara & Bombarda, Pamela, 2021. "Intellectual property rights, multinational firms and technology transfers," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 191-210.
    2. João J. Ferreira & Vanessa Ratten & Léo-Paul Dana, 2017. "Knowledge spillover-based strategic entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 161-167, March.
    3. Jean Bonnet & Sana El Harbi & Faten Gazzah, 2017. "Exploring the relationship between micro-enterprises and regional development: Evidence from Tunisia," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen) 2017-14, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes 1, University of Caen and CNRS.
    4. Vanda N. Veréb & João J. Ferreira, 2018. "Transnational Entrepreneurship as a Win-Win Scenario of International Knowledge Spillover," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(2), pages 446-472, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:25:y:2016:i:3:p:407-427.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.