IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i2p425-434..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Exclusion and Subjective Well-being Among Older Adults in Europe: Findings From the European Social Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Sunwoo Lee
  • James M Raymo

Abstract

ObjectivesThe current study aims to examine how social exclusion is related to subjective well-being in older adults across different European regions.MethodsEuropean population-based cross-sectional study design was employed using data sampled from the eighth round of the European Social Survey (ESS). Multiple items for social exclusion were used in this round, including household income, civic participation, frequent meetings with friends and relatives, basic health services, and neighborhood cohesion. Life satisfaction, happiness, and self-rated general health were also assessed. An ANOVA was performed to examine the regional differences related to social exclusion and subjective well-being, while a regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between the social exclusion and subjective well-being.ResultsThere were significant regional differences in the social exclusion and subjective well-being of older Europeans. In addition, older adults in the Nordic nations are more likely to indicate higher levels of subjective well-being and lower levels of social exclusion, while older adults from Central and Eastern European nations tend to report lower levels of subjective well-being and higher levels of social exclusion. Material resources and basic services are highlighted as the most important domains pertaining to life satisfaction, happiness, and general health.DiscussionThe study findings reinforce the inequality in subjective well-being linked to social exclusion across different societies. Both global and country-specific exclusion models in later life should be implemented in order to enhance comparable research and provide insight into EU and national guidelines for interventions to diminish social exclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Sunwoo Lee & James M Raymo, 2021. "Social Exclusion and Subjective Well-being Among Older Adults in Europe: Findings From the European Social Survey," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(2), pages 425-434.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:2:p:425-434.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaa172
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rodrigo Serrat & Fredrica Nyqvist & Sandra Torres & Sarah Dury & Marina Näsman, 2023. "Civic engagement among foreign-born and native-born older adults living in Europe: a SHARE-based analysis," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Kazushige Ide & Seungwon Jeong & Taishi Tsuji & Ryota Watanabe & Yasuhiro Miyaguni & Hirotaka Nakamura & Miyako Kimura & Katsunori Kondo, 2022. "Suggesting Indicators of Age-Friendly City: Social Participation and Happiness, an Ecological Study from the JAGES," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Kozar Łukasz, 2021. "Non-Monetary Indicators of Social Exclusion – A Multidimensional Comparative Analysis of the Eu-10 Countries," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 25(4), pages 40-53, December.
    4. Beata Bieszk-Stolorz & Krzysztof Dmytrów, 2023. "The Well-Being-Related Living Conditions of Elderly People in the European Union—Selected Aspects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Marja J. Aartsen & Marian Vasile & Laura A. Tufa & Diana A. Dumitrescu & Rosa M. Radogna & Jonathan Wörn & Iuliana Precupetu, 2023. "Patterns and correlates of old-age social exclusion in the Balkan states," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:2:p:425-434.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.