IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v72y2017i3p436-440..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multidimensionality of Younger and Older Adults’ Age Stereotypes: The Interaction of Life Domain and Adjective Dimension

Author

Listed:
  • Beatrice G. Kuhlmann
  • Anna E. Kornadt
  • Ute J. Bayen
  • Katharina Meuser
  • Liliane Wulff

Abstract

Objectives:The authors investigated the sources of age-stereotype multidimensionality with the help of personal everyday statements that differed with respect to life domain (e.g., family and partnership vs financial matters) and the adjective dimension reflected in the behavior (e.g., autonomous vs instrumental behavior).Method:A total of 368 statements reflecting autonomy-, instrumentality-, or integrity-related behaviors in five different life domains were generated. Sixty-nine younger (18–26 years) and 74 older (60–84 years) participants rated the typicality of each statement for either a “young adult” or an “old adult.”Results:Occurrence and direction of age stereotypes varied by life domain and adjective dimension and ultimately depended on the specific combination of both factors (i.e., a significant interaction). For example, old adults were expected to be optimistic about religious aspects but not about their health, fitness, and appearance.Discussion:The findings highlight the multidimensionality and complexity of age stereotypes based on a wide array of personal everyday statements.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatrice G. Kuhlmann & Anna E. Kornadt & Ute J. Bayen & Katharina Meuser & Liliane Wulff, 2017. "Multidimensionality of Younger and Older Adults’ Age Stereotypes: The Interaction of Life Domain and Adjective Dimension," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(3), pages 436-440.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:3:p:436-440.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbv049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna E. Kornadt & Klaus Rothermund, 2011. "Contexts of Aging: Assessing Evaluative Age Stereotypes in Different Life Domains," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(5), pages 547-556.
    2. Martina Miche & Hans-Werner Wahl & Manfred Diehl & Frank Oswald & Roman Kaspar & Maren Kolb, 2014. "Natural Occurrence of Subjective Aging Experiences in Community-Dwelling Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 69(2), pages 174-187.
    3. Sarah J. Barber & Mara Mather & Margaret Gatz, 2015. "How Stereotype Threat Affects Healthy Older Adults’ Performance on Clinical Assessments of Cognitive Decline: The Key Role of Regulatory Fit," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(6), pages 891-900.
    4. Natalie J. Sabik, 2015. "Editor's choice Ageism and Body Esteem: Associations With Psychological Well-Being Among Late Middle-Aged African American and European American Women," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(2), pages 189-199.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sibila Marques & João Mariano & Joana Mendonça & Wouter De Tavernier & Moritz Hess & Laura Naegele & Filomena Peixeiro & Daniel Martins, 2020. "Determinants of Ageism against Older Adults: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-27, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Verena Klusmann & Nanna Notthoff & Ann-Kristin Beyer & Anne Blawert & Martina Gabrian, 2020. "The assessment of views on ageing: a review of self-report measures and innovative extensions," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 403-433, December.
    2. Anna E Kornadt & Thomas M Hess & Peggy Voss & Klaus Rothermund, 2018. "Subjective Age Across the Life Span: A Differentiated, Longitudinal Approach," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(5), pages 767-777.
    3. Bénédicte Apouey, 2020. "Conditions of Existence and Subjective Perceptions of Retirement: Quantitative Evidence from France," PSE Working Papers halshs-02908456, HAL.
    4. Sibila Marques & João Mariano & Joana Mendonça & Wouter De Tavernier & Moritz Hess & Laura Naegele & Filomena Peixeiro & Daniel Martins, 2020. "Determinants of Ageism against Older Adults: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Mélanie Emile & Fabienne d’Arripe-Longueville & Boris Cheval & Massimiliano Amato & Aïna Chalabaev, 2015. "An Ego Depletion Account of Aging Stereotypes’ Effects on Health-Related Variables," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(6), pages 876-885.
    6. Bénédicte Apouey, 2020. "Conditions of Existence and Subjective Perceptions of Retirement: Quantitative Evidence from France," Working Papers halshs-02908456, HAL.
    7. Kellogg, Alexander J. & Hancock, David W. & Cho, Grace Y. & Reid, Allecia E., 2023. "Community-level age bias and older adult mortality," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    8. Martin Söllner & Mirjam Dürnberger & Johannes Keller & Arnd Florack, 2022. "The Impact of Age Stereotypes on Well-being: Strategies of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation as Mediator and Regulatory Focus as Moderator: Findings from a Cross-Sectional and a Longitudinal S," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 635-665, February.
    9. Lotte P. Brinkhof & Sanne de Wit & Jaap M. J. Murre & Harm J. Krugers & K. Richard Ridderinkhof, 2022. "The Subjective Experience of Ageism: The Perceived Ageism Questionnaire (PAQ)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    10. A. E. Burton & S. E. Dean & W. Demeyin & J. Reeves, 2021. "Questionnaire measures of self-directed ageing stereotype in older adults: a systematic review of measurement properties," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 117-144, March.
    11. Serena Sabatini & Obioha C. Ukoumunne & Allyson Brothers & Manfred Diehl & Hans-Werner Wahl & Clive Ballard & Rachel Collins & Anne Corbett & Helen Brooker & Linda Clare, 2022. "Differences in awareness of positive and negative age-related changes accounting for variability in health outcomes," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1087-1097, December.
    12. Peggy Voss & Julia K. Wolff & Klaus Rothermund, 2017. "Relations between views on ageing and perceived age discrimination: a domain-specific perspective," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 5-15, March.
    13. Kellogg, Alexander J. & Hancock, David W. & Cho, Grace Y. & Reid, Allecia E., 2023. "Reprint of: Community-level age bias and older adult mortality," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    14. Kieran Walsh & Thomas Scharf & Norah Keating, 2017. "Social exclusion of older persons: a scoping review and conceptual framework," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 81-98, March.
    15. Julia K. Wolff & Benjamin Schüz & Jochen P. Ziegelmann & Lisa M. Warner & Susanne Wurm, 2017. "Short-Term Buffers, but Long-Term Suffers? Differential Effects of Negative Self-Perceptions of Aging Following Serious Health Events," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(3), pages 408-414.
    16. Martina Gabrian & Hans-Werner Wahl, 2017. "Being slower, feeling older? Experimentally induced cognitive aging experiences have limited impact on subjective age," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 179-188, June.
    17. Eva-Marie Kessler & Sophie Rahn & Florian Klapproth, 2020. "Do young people prefer older psychotherapists?," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 119-124, March.
    18. Thomas H. Gerhardy & Anna Schlomann & Hans-Werner Wahl & Laura I. Schmidt, 2022. "Effects of age simulation suits on psychological and physical outcomes: a systematic review," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 953-976, December.
    19. Vegard Skirbekk & Michaela PotanÄ oková & Conrad Hackett & Marcin Stonawski, 2018. "Religious Affiliation Among Older Age Groups Worldwide: Estimates for 2010 and Projections Until 2050," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(8), pages 1439-1445.
    20. Jeongsoo Park & Thomas M. Hess & Helene H. Fung & Anna Kornadt & Klaus Rothermund, 2022. "A longitudinal study of the effects of well-being and perceived control on preparations for old age: moderation effects of contexts," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1429-1440, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:3:p:436-440.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.