IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v43y2016i3p383-400..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The income penalty of farming and fishing: results from a sibling approach

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Nordin
  • Johan Blomquist
  • Staffan Waldo

Abstract

This study explores an apparently paradoxical finding in farming and fishing: low economic returns, but a high rate of occupational transmission across generations of farmers and fishers. Using a sibling model containing 11,924 children of Swedish farmers and fishers in 2012, we estimate that farmers' sons who became farmers received 28 per cent lower income than same-sex siblings with a career outside farming. For farmers' daughters and fishers' sons, the income gap was about 22 per cent relative to same-sex siblings. Our conclusion is that the decision to become a fisher or a farmer is largely determined by non-pecuniary factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Nordin & Johan Blomquist & Staffan Waldo, 2016. "The income penalty of farming and fishing: results from a sibling approach," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(3), pages 383-400.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:43:y:2016:i:3:p:383-400.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/erae/jbv036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Nordin & Sören Höjgård, 2019. "Earnings and Disposable Income of Farmers in Sweden, 1997–2012," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 153-173, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:43:y:2016:i:3:p:383-400.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.