IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v131y2021i635p1215-1249..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fragmented Ownership and Natural Resource Use: Evidence from the Bakken

Author

Listed:
  • Bryan Leonard
  • Dominic P Parker

Abstract

Does land fragmentation impair spatially expansive natural resource use? We conduct empirical tests using ownership variation on the Bakken, one of the world's most valuable shale oil reserves. Long before shale was discovered, US policies created a mosaic of private, jointly owned and tribal government parcels on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation. We find that all three forms of fragmentation reduced production during the 2010–15 oil boom, especially joint ownership and the interspersion of small parcels of government and private land. We estimate implied gains from consolidation and discuss implications for the use (or conservation) of other spatially expansive resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Bryan Leonard & Dominic P Parker, 2021. "Fragmented Ownership and Natural Resource Use: Evidence from the Bakken," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(635), pages 1215-1249.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:131:y:2021:i:635:p:1215-1249.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueaa097
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:131:y:2021:i:635:p:1215-1249.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.