IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ecinqu/v44y2006i4p629-643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unemployment and Other Measures of Labor Market Inefficiency: A Comparison of U.K. and U.S. Labor Markets 1931--96

Author

Listed:
  • Keith A. Bender
  • Rebecca M. Neumann
  • John Douglas Skåtun

Abstract

Although unemployment is often used as a measure of labor market inefficiency, economic theory indicates that market inefficiency is determined by both the gap between and the elasticities of supply and demand. Using time series data for the United States and United Kingdom, this article investigates how good the unemployment rate is as a measure of labor market inefficiency by calculating the deadweight loss associated with unemployment rates over time. Results show that the loss arising from unemployment is low across time and countries and that the unemployment rate is often a weak proxy for comparing labor market inefficiency. (JEL J6) Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Keith A. Bender & Rebecca M. Neumann & John Douglas Skåtun, 2006. "Unemployment and Other Measures of Labor Market Inefficiency: A Comparison of U.K. and U.S. Labor Markets 1931--96," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 44(4), pages 629-643, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:44:y:2006:i:4:p:629-643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ei/cbj039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J6 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:44:y:2006:i:4:p:629-643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/weaaaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.