IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ecinqu/v28y1990i4p744-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Contribution to the Theory of Depletable Resource Scarcity and Its Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Cairns, Robert D

Abstract

Economists commonly use rent and unit costs as measures of nonrenewable resource scarcity and identify the types of scarcity as Malthusian or Ricardian. Thomas Malthus and David Ricardo, however, concerned themselves mainly with renewable agricultural land; John Stuart Mill and Jevons William Stanley provided major insights into nonrenewable resource scarcity. A simple model of mining brings out the contributions of major classical and other writers, and shows that unit costs and rent are not necessarily useful indicators of scarcity. Exhaustibility of the deposit and choice of capital stock appear more pertinent to firms' intertemporal decisions than exhaustibility of world reserves. Copyright 1990 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Cairns, Robert D, 1990. "A Contribution to the Theory of Depletable Resource Scarcity and Its Measures," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 28(4), pages 744-755, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:28:y:1990:i:4:p:744-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Norgaard, Richard B., 1992. "Sustainability and the economics of assuring assets for future generations," Policy Research Working Paper Series 832, The World Bank.
    2. M. Northrup Buechner, 2014. "A comment on scarcity," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 8(1), November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:28:y:1990:i:4:p:744-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/weaaaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.