IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/copoec/v38y2019i1p12-30..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discursive Strategies In The Keynes-Hayek Debate: Building A Liberal Critique

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle Guizzo

Abstract

This article addresses an analysis of discourse based on Michel Foucault’s ‘order of discourse’ to comprehend which discursive forces influenced Keynes’s mode of thought and his liberal critique. The article returns to the Keynes–Hayek debate to explore the possibilities of considering Hayek as a reverse influence in Keynes’s late beliefs on the limits of state action and socially desired ends. An understanding of Keynes’s view on the state and economic action requires identifying the underlying strategies of his discourse when criticizing Hayek’s spontaneous liberalism. More specifically, Hayek’s liberal views promoted a reverse and discontinuous force that contributed to reinforce Keynes’s mode of thought.

Suggested Citation

  • Danielle Guizzo, 2019. "Discursive Strategies In The Keynes-Hayek Debate: Building A Liberal Critique," Contributions to Political Economy, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(1), pages 12-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:38:y:2019:i:1:p:12-30.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cpe/bzz014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hubert Gabrisch, 2020. "Elements, origins and future of Great Transformations: Eastern Europe and global capitalism," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(2), pages 172-190, June.
    2. Saura, Jose Ramon & Palacios-Marqués, Daniel & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2023. "Exploring the boundaries of open innovation: Evidence from social media mining," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:38:y:2019:i:1:p:12-30.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.