IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v8y2015i1p61-77..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical interventions into the corporate smart city

Author

Listed:
  • Robert G. Hollands

Abstract

Driven by the profit motive of global high-technology companies, in collusion with the trend towards city governance being wedded to a competitive form of ‘urban entrepreneurialism’, has left little room for ordinary people to participate in the smart city. The article seeks to make a two-fold critical intervention into the dominance of this corporate smart city model. It does this by first looking at how we currently understand the smart city and critiques the growing trend towards corporate and entrepreneurial governance versions. A second form of intervention concerns considering smartness from different perspectives emanating from small-scale and fledgling examples of participatory and citizen-based types of smart initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert G. Hollands, 2015. "Critical interventions into the corporate smart city," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 61-77.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:8:y:2015:i:1:p:61-77.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsu011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Chatterton, 2013. "Towards an Agenda for Post-carbon Cities: Lessons from Lilac, the UK's First Ecological, Affordable Cohousing Community," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1654-1674, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aimee Felstead & Kevin Thwaites & James Simpson, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework for Urban Commoning in Shared Residential Landscapes in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Xiaoqing Zhu & Tiancheng Zhang & Weijun Gao & Danying Mei, 2020. "Analysis on Spatial Pattern and Driving Factors of Carbon Emission in Urban–Rural Fringe Mixed-Use Communities: Cases Study in East Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Andrew Williams & Mark Goodwin & Paul Cloke, 2014. "Neoliberalism, Big Society, and Progressive Localism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(12), pages 2798-2815, December.
    4. Ornella Iuorio & Andrew Wallace & Kate Simpson, 2019. "Prefabs in the North of England: Technological, Environmental and Social Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Pablo Newberry & Paul Harper & Thea Morgan, 2021. "Understanding the Market for Eco Self-Build Community Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-32, October.
    6. Lidewij Tummers, 2016. "The re-emergence of self-managed co-housing in Europe: A critical review of co-housing research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(10), pages 2023-2040, August.
    7. Chen-Yi Sun & Yen-An Chen & Xiuzhi Zhang, 2019. "Key Factors in the Success of Eco-Communities in Taiwan’s Countryside: The Role of Government, Partner, and Community Group," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-11, February.
    8. Sharifi, Ayyoob & Yamagata, Yoshiki, 2016. "Principles and criteria for assessing urban energy resilience: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 1654-1677.
    9. Yong Tu, 2018. "Urban debates for climate change after the Kyoto Protocol," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(1), pages 3-18, January.
    10. Upham, Dr Paul & Sovacool, Prof Benjamin & Ghosh, Dr Bipashyee, 2022. "Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: A framework for innovation, participation, and justice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    11. Stewart Barr & Justin Pollard, 2017. "Geographies of Transition: Narrating environmental activism in an age of climate change and ‘Peak Oil’," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(1), pages 47-64, January.
    12. Jenny Pickerill, 2017. "Critically Interrogating Eco-Homes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 353-365, March.
    13. Ziyi Wang & Zengqiao Chen & Cuiping Ma & Ronald Wennersten & Qie Sun, 2022. "Nationwide Evaluation of Urban Energy System Resilience in China Using a Comprehensive Index Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-36, February.
    14. Xunzhi Yin & Qi Dong & Siyuan Zhou & Jiaqi Yu & Lu Huang & Cheng Sun, 2020. "Energy-Saving Potential of Applying Prefabricated Straw Bale Construction (PSBC) in Domestic Buildings in Northern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Sara Thomas Black & Richard Anthony Milligan & Nik Heynen, 2016. "Solidarity in Climate/Immigrant Justice Direct Action: Lessons from Movements in the US South," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 284-298, March.
    16. Heli Zacharya & Avinoam Meir & Nurit Alfasi, 2022. "A Place Within a Place: Location Choice by Intentional Communities," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(5), pages 469-482, December.
    17. Anđelina Svirčić Gotovac & Boštjan Kerbler, 2019. "From Post-Socialist to Sustainable: The City of Ljubljana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Trond-Arne Borgersen, 2022. "A Housing Market with Cournot Competition and a Third Housing Sector," International Journal of Economic Sciences, European Research Center, vol. 11(2), pages 13-27, November.
    19. Meg Holden & Charling Li & Ana Molina, 2015. "The Emergence and Spread of Ecourban Neighbourhoods around the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Jenny Pickerill & Tendai Chitewere & Natasha Cornea & Joshua Lockyer & Rachel Macrorie & Jan Malý Blažek & Anitra Nelson, 2024. "URBAN ECOLOGICAL FUTURES: Five Eco‐Community Strategies for more Sustainable and Equitable Cities," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 161-176, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:8:y:2015:i:1:p:61-77.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.