IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v97y2010i4p921-934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of controlled direct effects on a dichotomous outcome using logistic structural direct effect models

Author

Listed:
  • Stijn Vansteelandt

Abstract

We consider the problem of assessing whether an exposure affects a dichotomous outcome other than by modifying a given mediator. The standard approach, logistic regression adjusting for both exposure and the mediator, is known to be biased in the presence of confounders for the mediator-outcome relationship. Because additional regression adjustment for such confounders is only justified when they are not affected by the exposure, inverse probability weighting has been advocated, but is not ideally tailored to mediators that are continuous or have strong measured predictors. We overcome this limitation by developing inference for a novel class of causal models that are closely related to Robins' logistic structural direct effect models, but do not inherit their difficulties of estimation. We study identification and efficient estimation under the assumption that all confounders for the exposure-outcome and mediator-outcome relationships have been measured, and find adequate performance in simulation studies. We discuss extensions to case-control studies and relevant implications for the generic problem of adjustment for time-varying confounding. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Stijn Vansteelandt, 2010. "Estimation of controlled direct effects on a dichotomous outcome using logistic structural direct effect models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 97(4), pages 921-934.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:97:y:2010:i:4:p:921-934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asq053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:97:y:2010:i:4:p:921-934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.