IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v92y2005i2p492-498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical likelihood analysis of the rank estimator for the censored accelerated failure time model

Author

Listed:
  • Mai Zhou

Abstract

We use the empirical likelihood method to derive a test and thus a confidence interval based on the rank estimators of the regression coefficient in the accelerated failure time model. Standard chi-squared distributions are used to calculate the p-value and to construct the confidence interval. Simulations and examples show that the chi-squared approximation to the distribution of the log empirical likelihood ratio performs well, and has some advantages over the existing methods. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Mai Zhou, 2005. "Empirical likelihood analysis of the rank estimator for the censored accelerated failure time model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(2), pages 492-498, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:92:y:2005:i:2:p:492-498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/92.2.492
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Song & Zhao, Yichuan, 2007. "Testing treatment effect by combining weighted log-rank tests and using empirical likelihood," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(12), pages 1385-1393, July.
    2. Ming Zheng & Wen Yu, 2013. "Empirical likelihood method for multivariate Cox regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1241-1267, June.
    3. Yu, Lili & Peace, Karl E., 2012. "Spline nonparametric quasi-likelihood regression within the frame of the accelerated failure time model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(9), pages 2675-2687.
    4. Yuan, Ao & Xu, Jinfeng & Zheng, Gang, 2012. "Root-n estimability of some missing data models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 147-166.
    5. Lili Yu & Liang Liu & Ding-Geng(Din) Chen, 2013. "Weighted Least-Squares Method for Right-Censored Data in Accelerated Failure Time Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 358-365, June.
    6. Cheng, Jung-Yu & Tzeng, Shinn-Jia, 2009. "Parametric and semiparametric methods for mapping quantitative trait loci," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 1843-1849, March.
    7. Wen Yu & Yunting Sun & Ming Zheng, 2011. "Empirical likelihood method for linear transformation models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 63(2), pages 331-346, April.
    8. Wanrong Liu & Xuewen Lu, 2011. "Empirical likelihood for density-weighted average derivatives," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 391-412, May.
    9. Zhao, Yichuan, 2011. "Empirical likelihood inference for the accelerated failure time model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(5), pages 603-610, May.
    10. Shen, Junshan & Yuen, Kam Chuen & Liu, Chunling, 2016. "Empirical likelihood confidence regions for one- or two- samples with doubly censored data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 285-293.
    11. Mu Zhao & Yixin Wang & Yong Zhou, 2016. "Accelerated failure time model with quantile information," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 68(5), pages 1001-1024, October.
    12. Tong Tong Wu & Gang Li & Chengyong Tang, 2015. "Empirical Likelihood for Censored Linear Regression and Variable Selection," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(3), pages 798-812, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:92:y:2005:i:2:p:492-498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.