IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v32y2021i6p1163-1170..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male reproductive adjustments to an introduced nest predator

Author

Listed:
  • Isaac Gravolin
  • Topi K Lehtonen
  • Nicholas D S Deal
  • Ulrika Candolin
  • Bob B M Wong

Abstract

Nest predation has a large impact on reproductive success in many taxa. Defending offspring from would-be predators can also be energetically and physiologically costly for parents. Thus, to maximize their reproductive payoffs, individuals should adjust their reproductive behaviors in relation to the presence of nest predators. However, effects of nest predator presence on parental behaviors across multiple reproductive contexts remain poorly understood, particularly in non-avian taxa. We ran a series of experiments to test how the presence of an egg predator, the invasive rockpool shrimp, Palaemon elegans, influences male reproductive decisions and egg survival in a species of fish with exclusive paternal care, the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. We found that, in the presence of shrimp, male sticklebacks were less likely to build a nest, invested less in territory defense against an intruder, and tended to fan eggs in their nest less and in shorter bouts, but did not alter their investment in courtship behavior. The predator’s presence also did not affect egg survival rates, suggesting that males effectively defended their brood from the shrimp. These results show that reproducing individuals can be highly responsive to the presence of nest predators and adjust their behavioral decisions accordingly across a suite of reproductive contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Isaac Gravolin & Topi K Lehtonen & Nicholas D S Deal & Ulrika Candolin & Bob B M Wong, 2021. "Male reproductive adjustments to an introduced nest predator," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1163-1170.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:32:y:2021:i:6:p:1163-1170.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arab079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sini Johnson & Ulrika Candolin, 2017. "Predation cost of a sexual signal in the threespine stickleback," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 1160-1165.
    2. Susana I. Peluc & T. Scott Sillett & John T. Rotenberry & Cameron K. Ghalambor, 2008. "Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in an island songbird exposed to a novel predation risk," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(4), pages 830-835.
    3. Cameron K. Ghalambor, 2002. "Comparative manipulation of predation risk in incubating birds reveals variability in the plasticity of responses," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(1), pages 101-108, January.
    4. Geoffrey B. Steinhart & Melissa E. Sandrene & Stephanie Weaver & Roy A. Stein & Elizabeth A. Marschall, 2005. "Increased parental care cost for nest-guarding fish in a lake with hyperabundant nest predators," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(2), pages 427-434, March.
    5. R. W. Elwood & K. E. Wood & M. B. Gallagher & J. T. A. Dick, 1998. "Probing motivational state during agonistic encounters in animals," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6680), pages 66-68, May.
    6. Jukka T. Forsman & Mikko Mönkkönen & Erkki Korpimäki & Robert L. Thomson, 2013. "Mammalian nest predator feces as a cue in avian habitat selection decisions," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 262-266.
    7. Sönke Eggers & Michael Griesser & Jan Ekman, 2008. "Predator-induced reductions in nest visitation rates are modified by forest cover and food availability," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(5), pages 1056-1062.
    8. Thorsten B. H. Reusch & Michael A. Häberli & Peter B. Aeschlimann & Manfred Milinski, 2001. "Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6861), pages 300-302, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helen R. Sofaer & T. Scott Sillett & Susana I. Peluc & Scott A. Morrison & Cameron K. Ghalambor, 2013. "Differential effects of food availability and nest predation risk on avian reproductive strategies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 698-707.
    2. Joachim G Frommen & Timo Thünken & Francesca Santostefano & Valentina Balzarini & Attila Hettyey, 2022. "Effects of chronic and acute predation risk on sexual ornamentation and mating preferences [Effects of perceived predation risk and social environment on the development of three-spined stickleback," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 7-16.
    3. Alessandra Basso & Michael Coslovsky & Heinz Richner, 2014. "Parasite- and predator-induced maternal effects in the great tit (Parus major)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1105-1114.
    4. Ringelman, Kevin M., 2014. "Predator foraging behavior and patterns of avian nest success: What can we learn from an agent-based model?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 141-149.
    5. Ariane Mutzel & Anne-Lise Olsen & Kimberley J Mathot & Yimen G Araya-Ajoy & Marion Nicolaus & Jan J Wijmenga & Jonathan Wright & Bart Kempenaers & Niels J Dingemanse, 2019. "Effects of manipulated levels of predation threat on parental provisioning and nestling begging," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 1123-1135.
    6. Nicole A. Schneider & Michael Griesser, 2013. "Incubating females use dynamic risk assessment to evaluate the risk posed by different predators," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 47-52.
    7. Scott J. Chiavacci & Michael P. Ward & Thomas J. Benson, 2015. "Why fledge early in the day? Examining the role of predation risk in explaining fledging behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 593-600.
    8. Jakub Szymkowiak & Lechosław Kuczyński, 2015. "Avoiding predators in a fluctuating environment: responses of the wood warbler to pulsed resources," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 601-608.
    9. Daiping Wang & Wenyuan Zhang & Shuai Yang & Xiang-Yi Li Richter, 2023. "Sex differences in avian parental care patterns vary across the breeding cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:32:y:2021:i:6:p:1163-1170.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.